Heh heh... At 52, this is similar to the experiences of my youth. At that time, when 300 baud couplers and HUGE (as in box the size of something you could keep canadian snow boots in) 2400 baud modems, there weren't even LAWS agains that kind of stuff in Germany. And let me guess - you used DATEX-P, an X.25 network, using a stolen NUI.
Oh well. BS2000. For those who do not know what it was: Take some IBM OS meant for a
At that time, you'd find unprotected SINTRAN-III machines by Norsk Data at CERN...
Spider should absolutely be on the list!
With the third Lady Sally book still unsold and currently busy writing sequels to his "inherited" Heinlein book, there's hopefully more to come. Utterly different SF, but worth reading.
"Major Snorkum will bend the cake!"
Another former soldier here. From a country which learned that war means your country is in ruins afterwards - and you will probably have lost someone you love. War is more than just sending heroes out to foreign countries to kill the "bad guys".
Of course, I would expect everybody up to NCO level to be against the conventions, as it makes their life more difficult. Working to international conventions requires judgement and thinking. But of course, life would be much easier if you could fire at civilians at will, use land mines, chemical weapons, napalm and many other toys.
I've seen the video. In addition, I read the official report, which is ALSO available online.
"INVESTIGATION INTO CIVILIAN
CASUALTIES RESULTING FROM AN
ENGAGEMENT ON 12 JULY 2007 IN
THE NEW BAGHDAD DISTRICT OF
Report of Investigation UP AR 15-6
MAJ , Investigating Officer
2ND BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM
2ND INFANTRY DIVISION (MND-B)"
The official report shows the following in Exhibit O:
AK found on the ground.
RPG-7 photo redacted, nothing to be seen.
In Exhibit R, we see photos which appear to be taken by the journalist before being shot at. You can recognize in detail a US HMMWV in telephoto range.
So, yes, there was at least an AK rifle and the helicopter crew might have at least good reason to see that a RPG attack was imminent. Exhibit C mentions "Probable Telephoto lens", but is this obvious to trigger-happy kids in a gunship? I doubt it. Plus they don't want to be responsible for the results of not taking action.
(Read paragraph 6 on page 12 of 43.)
The helicopter crew reports and requests permission to fire.
So far, this is more or less an unavoidable chain of events. Most likely a mistake, but given the circumstances, understandable.
Have we learned to shoot at wounded combatants? At people trying to help the wounded? Which are obviously not returning fire?
There's the war crime.
Not the question here. The (assumed) literary value of a copy/paste novel wouldn't be reduced in any way by some kind of attribution. In fact, it would even be improved.
So why admit to major plagiarism only after being caught?
September 11 was an impressive move in asymmetric warfare. We are still suffering from the attack - just try to board a plane. Was it something novel? Yes. Did it help the attacker's cause? Yes. Did they play by (what we consider to be) the rules? No.
Society has rules. For warfare and for literature.
*sigh* It is one thing to quote a well-known work. It is another one to have a well-known father in literarture and creating a copy/paste novel, stealing from lesser-known bloggers and bands. This is not about taking inspiration from other authors. Also not about quoting, either literally (as seen in science) or as an easy-to-get reference, such as an in-joke.
This is not Pratchett's Sam Vimes using a swamp dragon as a weapon, in a hilarious Dirty Harry quote. Also not Blade Runner quoting Metropolis. This is "Oh cool. I'll copy and paste this and make it my own because noone will notice."
Hegemann cannot even remember some major passages of her OWN book, as demonstrated in a recent talk show. No wonder - copy and paste will not leave as strong an impression in someones memory as doing it yourself.
Seriously. There are a lot of web sites comparing text from both sources. And yes, it IS a ripoff.
We'll use Google translate to translate one of the samples here:
Axolotl Roadkill, page 23:
"I have a fever, problems with coordinationn, [one part per 1000] in the overheated blood
Strobe, page 106:
"I have a degree fever, and barely [one part per 1000] alcohol in the overheated blood."
By the way - she copied from more than one source.
Damn. Mod my post down. I shouldn't have done such a name calling to a teen girl.
Make this "Stupid, ignorant, thieving teen girl" and mod him up.
The best part of business trips to the UK is watching BBC. Superb, compared to the stuff in most other countries.
Nope... This feature is more than just time-based, at least in German Wikipedia.
Mind checking facts before bullshitting?
Not to mention that this group pf people will elect each other.
Bingo. You defined Germany's Adminipedia perfectly.
One example: Article reverted with dubious cause. Person who did the original change asked for a reason for the revert. Answer? "Because I can."
Second one: Article about an aspect of physics. Person with degree in physics corrects article, quoting publication in peer-reviewed, accepted magazine. Reverted due to "no reference given".
Unlike Usenet, Wikipedia in some areas IS run by a cabal.
Also, people might just prefer the Mail app that comes with the Mac. Office costs a lot more than $29 and wouldn't get you the finder and general speed improvements. In the past why people didn't go the Entourage route? Not sure. Probably the usual IT argument that it is another platform to support and their techs would have to be retrained, maybe there software push apps don't work with Mac etc.
My work is a research institute so people are quite happy to use whatever they like best and at least some of them can do it themselves. About 70% of our systems are Mac, we do discourage windows but if people need it they can get it. Heck I even had one guy go and install Services for Unix on his windows box because he was more comfortable scripting on UNIX but needed windows for his app
O I know they aren't going to put it back.. which is why everyone will be downloading this via torrent and feeling good about it...
Yeah, that's why. Whine and cry and then pirate a game because you don't get your way. You sure showed them, they'll be positively clamoring to give you everything you want next time!
You know what claiming you're going to pirate a game because the Big Bad Creators didn't give you something you want says? It says "I love your game so much I can't live without it, despite you not giving me what I want. Therefore I am going to be a petulant child."
Good luck with that. Whatever moral justifications you try to shroud it in, you're just a self-entitled brat crying because he doesn't get his way.
You want to make a point about how important LAN play is to their game? Don't play their fucking game.
If you bought your computer on or after June 8th you can get Snow Leopard for 10 bucks:
10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0.