Comment: Re:2 kW enough? (Score 1) 52
Comment: Re:2 kW enough? (Score 1) 52
They mean AVERAGE, not maximum output. And if you have batteries in place, and transformers, and actually one little small el.central....
Really?
"This methane-fueled cell achieves about 50% efficiency at around 2kW, enough to power an average home."
So it is not enough to power an "average" home for peak use. And it is not enough to power an average home for average use in a very warm climate. AC uses a lot of power.
Comment: Re:2 kW enough? (Score 3, Informative) 52
Comment: Re:Will anyone notice... (Score 1) 108
Comment: Will anyone notice... (Score 1, Funny) 108
Comment: Re:this woman is an attorney? (Score 1) 345
Comment: Re:this woman is an attorney? (Score 2, Funny) 345
Comment: Re:Until you can prove them wrong (Score 1) 1153
If you can postulate a world where it is possible for things to "just exist" without being created, then our universe can be one of those things which "just exists". That is a far simpler answer than claiming that there must be an all-powerful creator who "just exists" and who, in turn, created the universe.
My virtual beings in my virtual world could make exactly the same argument. Since I know they would be factually wrong, I have to conclude that the argument is bad (even should it happened to be correct in this case).
They would not be factually wrong. The argument is not that their world must "just exist", but rather that there is no evidence either way, and that the model without a creator is the one with fewer assumptions. Both of those statements are factually correct. The burden of proof is on those postulating the existence of a creator to come up with actual evidence supporting the more complex model.
Comment: Re:links (Score 1) 505
I only clicked a handful of the actual images, but most of them give "No pages link to this file" or it links to some user's Talk page.
So it means you won't get to these images if you just use the Wiki as you normally would.
So where is the problem really?