Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Why should we care if the artists are making less? (Score 1, Interesting) 567

by Maudib (#40102213) Attached to: New Music Boss, Worse Than Old Music Boss

The artists were part of the problem in the old system. So long as they are trying to perpetuate the abuses of the current copyright system, they are still a problem. Until the DMCA and CTEA are overturned, we should celebrate the losses of any musicians that rely on these for profit. They are party to the greatest theft from the commons ever. They can work for free until that debt is repaid.

Comment: some of the exceptions (Score 1) 3

First, it is not a federal law that prohibits non-rich people from investing, it is state laws, generally known as "Blue Sky laws", and they differ by state. It is not the individual who is prohibited from investing, it is the startup which is prohibited from allowing the individual to invest, and particularly from making a "public offering", e.g. putting an ad in a public place soliciting investment.

Many of the state laws recognize the following exceptions to the general principal that non-rich people can't invest in startups: People who know the founders well are permitted to invest; professional investors are permitted to invest; employees of the startup are permitted to invest. I think there are some other exceptions. IANAL.

Businesses

US founders: show how many jobs you could create if the crowdfunding law passed-> 3

Submitted by
bshanks
bshanks writes "Currently, U.S. law prohibits people who are not rich from investing in startups (this is an oversimplification, there are various exceptions to this rule), on the theory that startups are too risky for ordinary people to invest in and that ordinary people are not qualified to protect themselves against individuals fraudulently taking money claiming it will go to a non-existent/fake startup. There is currently "crowdfunding" legislation pending in the U.S. Congress that would alter the law to allow anyone to invest a small amount of money in startups. The proposed legislation passed overwhelmingly in the House and is now in committee in the Senate. If it doesn't make it to the Senate floor soon it may die. Apparently, the Senate wants to see more public interest in this before they move on it.

US founders: register at this site to show how many jobs you could create if the crowdfunding law passed!"

Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Many versus Awesome (Score 1) 600

by Maudib (#38943551) Attached to: India Turns Down American Fighter Jets, Buys From France

Why waste one of three bombs in the hope that a government that has committed itself to fight to the death will suddenly see reason?

Keep in mind that it wasn't until the U.S. dropped the SECOND bomb that the Japanese surrendered. The first attack didn't even elicit a response. This proves that a demonstration or attack on a non-mainland target would almost certainly have been pointless.

Also, what is so special about an atomic bomb really? Neither Hiroshima nor Nagaski hold the record for civilian casualties in a WWII air raid.

Are we not men?

Working...