Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission Summary: 0 pending, 36 declined, 8 accepted (44 total, 18.18% accepted)

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

+ - Lots of little Atoms or one big box?

Submitted by
Matey-O
Matey-O writes "My DMZ hobby box is getting a little winded. Evidently ntop, bittorrent, apache, mysql, wordpress, phpbb3, ruby, snort and snorby are more than a P4 with 512 mb of RAM can reasonably be expected to handle. I have three older P4 systems doing things like file services, Security auditing, IDS, and hosting a dozen or so websites (some with Wordpress and forum stuff). At any point in time, most of the machines are idle, but when I need them, they get pounded on pretty hard.

So, would you build 3 $150 Atom boxes, that consume less power at idle, or would you build a single $400 C2Quad box that could juggle all of the requirements on one box. (Assume, for the sake of arguement, that we're just talking about the DMZ security context, I'm not comfortable mixing home file services on the same box.)"

"One Architecture, One OS" also translates as "One Egg, One Basket".

Working...