I think if you read the whole thing, you'll find he's a pretty equal opportunity offender, sexual libertarians got a good hundred paragraphs against their lifestyle as well.
Not fault alone, of course. In many ways, I blame liberals of both stripes- fiscal conservatism these days is strongly libertarian, and thus, liberal.
One said says I want to fuck who I want to and damned the consequences tomorrow, we'll just kill any inconvenient product of sexual abuse. The other side says I want to profit from who I want to and damn the regulations, I am not my brother's financial keeper.
Both are putting radical self interest- liberty ahead of the common good- and liberty is liberalism.
And that's what went wrong with slavery in the United States. Too much whip, not enough bread. And then 70 years later with capitalism, too much whip, not enough bread.
Today we have too much bread and perhaps not enough whip, but what is there left to do?
Yep. And I could just see Franklin D, old Curmudgeon that he was, shouting to the Bonus Army "Get off my lawn!"
The Roman Emperors had it right- buy a bunch of state owned bakeries, and give everybody their "Daily Bread" (referenced even in the Lord's Prayer, though Christ had us thanking God for it instead of the Emperor).
Keep the slaves fed, they won't revolt.
At first it wasn't. At first- the War on Poverty had exactly ONE purpose- get the Bonus Army off of Roosevelt's front lawn.
Everything about it since then has been to prevent the revolt that almost did happen.
A huge part of the reason that America has turned leftwards, is because the Republican party has chosen to prioritize fiscal conservationism over social conservationism. Family no longer comes first for most of the Republican leadership, as shown in their marital woes.
The Democrats were always going to go Left, at least the Republicans *could* have given us another choice.
The entire intent of the welfare system since 1931 has been to prevent the working class from actually ever being uncomfortable enough to revolt. Campaign Promises bear no relation to actual truth.
The poor and the working class are to Democrats what the unborn are to Republicans: Great for winning elections, and thus, need to be kept in their current oppression so that they're still oppressed for the next election.
With binaries that is incredibly easy- just do a file compare on the binaries. Any two that are exactly the same byte length should be compared; any two that compile to exactly the same machine code should need to turn in source code.
That can be a dangerous precedent to set. In the real world, you only get paid for coming up with the right solution.
Which, of course, is points off for not providing a proper installer.
Why not just require all projects to be turned in as binaries, like the industry does?
Because HR Drones don't understand software, I am finding that quite often the tool DOES get you the job, and consequently, it's incredibly hard to break out of either the LAMP or Microsoft Silos when designing software. Sure, for a particular industrial robot, FORTH may be a better language, or for certain expert systems, LISP machines work well, but when doing such a project in the real world, there are only a few real choices- C#, C++, Java, or Python is all anybody cares about.
So make sure your students are exposed to a wide variety- but make sure they're EXPERTS in learning new frameworks and learning new syntax.
Try this one from Papa Francesco- Gays are a first world luxury that uses too many resources and should not be imposed on the third world by cultural imperialism.