Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Sam Raimi To Direct World of Warcraft Movie 298

Posted by Soulskill
from the this-is-my-boomstick dept.
Decado writes "Blizzard has just announced that Sam Raimi is to direct the new World of Warcraft movie. 'Raimi, acclaimed director of the blockbuster Spider-Man series, will bring the forces of the Horde and the Alliance to life in epic live-action film. Charles Roven's Atlas Entertainment will produce alongside Raimi's Stars Road Entertaiment.' While it's still early in the process, does this offer hope that someone might finally make a good movie based on a game IP?"

Comment: Re:Car makers shouldnt be making these cars anyway (Score 1) 307

by MarcoG42 (#28623155) Attached to: Toyota Builds a Patent Thicket For Hybrid Cars
There are serial hybrid vehicles in development, at the moment, in the US. One example would be an serial hybrid Humvee being developed for the US military. The same shop is also developing serial hybrids for UPS. The only roadblock they're currently experiencing is with battery technologies. Their first problem was they could not charge the batteries fast enough to keep up with their rate of depletion. That has been solved, but now some of the batteries tend to catch on fire under heavy loads, e.g., when they vehicles are moving at high rates of speed or going up steep inclines.

Note: My father used to work in the hybrid division of this company, but has since moved into the integrated systems division. I'm not entirely sure if the hybrid systems are still being developed or if they were scrapped.

Comment: Re:Void contract? (Score 1) 326

by MarcoG42 (#28311823) Attached to: Will AT&T Charge Extra For MMS & Tethering?
This is a quote from a standard PDA messaging plan from AT&T:
"Message any way, to anyone in the U.S. Send and receive 1500 text, picture, video, and Instant Messaging (IM) messages. Additional messages are 5 cents each."
So, yes, MMS is included in AT&T's messaging plans. So, if they attempt to charge separately for MMS there will be quite a lashback. Alternatively, if they raise the price of the iPhone SMS package to encompass the new MMS ability, everyone affected will be able to drop their contract at with no ETF.

Comment: Void contract? (Score 1) 326

by MarcoG42 (#28311105) Attached to: Will AT&T Charge Extra For MMS & Tethering?
I understand charging for tethering, that's to be expected. I'm curious about how they're going to handle MMS. Will they just include it in the cost of the $15 I'm already paying for 1500 text messages? If I understand the contract correctly, if they raise that fee it means I can opt out of my contract with no penalty because there has been a material change in the fees being charged. I don't see AT&T opening themselves up to droves of users ditching their contract in that manner. Nor do I see them having a separate "MMS Plan" for iPhone users, as that would piss off *everyone*. So, with any luck, we'll only see a new fee for tethering.

Comment: Re:Dubious speed claims (Score 1) 375

by MarcoG42 (#27748725) Attached to: Cablevision To Offer 101 Mbps Down, No Caps
I currently have Cablevision internet service and live in an urban apartment building in Brooklyn. The advertised speeds (30 Mb/s up and 5 Mb/s down) are what I get, consistently. In the three years I've had their service I have not had one outage, and I've never noticed a dramatic decrease in up or down speeds, no matter the time of day/week.

Comment: Re:Sue-Happy (Score 1) 230

by MarcoG42 (#27272975) Attached to: Apple and AT&T Sued, Again, Over 3G
I'm assuming you live in a house you built with your own two hands without a telephone, cable, satellite, electricity, running water or any of those other luxuries we have in these modern times? Since you're posting here, I doubt it. So, while we may not be forced into signing into these contracts, the case is more often starting to be that if you're lucky enough to have a choice of provider they force you to stick with them, regardless of whether they can provide you the service they promised through bullshit contracts.

It appears that you're completely missing the point in order to call people whiny bitches. Consider your opinion refuted.

Comment: Re:They have lowered the burden of proof. (Score 1) 619

by MarcoG42 (#26180635) Attached to: RIAA To Stop Prosecuting Individual File Sharers
That's a different animal altogether. Signing up to disconnect their paying customers is like cutting their own throat, and the big carriers have the money and lawyers to drive the *AA's into the ground. What happens when someone with a $40 net connection gets cut by his provider, who also happens to provide his phone and TV for an additional $90 or so. They'll cut that service, too, out of spite. There's no way the providers are going to open themselves up to that kind of thing, and I think they'll fight the *AA's every step of the way.

Comment: Re:They have lowered the burden of proof. (Score 1) 619

by MarcoG42 (#26173747) Attached to: RIAA To Stop Prosecuting Individual File Sharers
You think the ISPs are going to sign up to disconnect paying customers? I think the ISPs have a pretty good idea of how many of their customers download copyrighted material, and they will take into account how many of those users are paying customers. That is aside from what kind of cases could be brought against the ISP for disconnect users without any kind of real justification other than a letter from some non-government entity that says "We think this party took our stuff without paying for it." I don't really see the ISPs wanting to get involved in something like that.

Comment: Re:I can't bring myself to have much pity for them (Score 1) 574

by MarcoG42 (#25708475) Attached to: Circuit City Files For Bankruptcy
A store posting a sign that says "we reserve the right to..." doesn't give them the right to do something, especially if that something is illegal. So, while they can post a sign that says that they can search your personal belongings, would it hold up in court? Merely walking into a store and buying a pack of gum, a DVD or a $5000 television does not give anyone the right to search through my wife's purse or to make me turn out my pockets unless they have some kind of evidence to suspect me of theft. And even if they do have evidence that might lead them to believe I stole something, I'm going to be damn sure there are police and a few witnesses present before I'm searched for anything.

+ - New Milestone Demoscene Releases.-> 4

Submitted by
An anonymous reader writes "With over 3000 visitors one of the biggest computer festivals, the Assembly 2007, just closed doors. The event saw the release of some of the best demoscene productions of this year. Among them the first good demos for the XBOX 360, but also for platforms as obscure as the Atari VCS2600 from 1976. The main demo competition was won by Lifeforce, one of the most acclaimed demoscene demos ever. Other releases can be found here."
Link to Original Source

+ - New Theory Explains Periodic Mass Extinctions

Submitted by i_like_spam
i_like_spam (874080) writes "The theory that the dinosaurs were wiped out by an asteroid impact, the K-T extinction, is well known and supported by fossil and geological evidence. Asteroid impact theory does not apply to the other fluctuations in biodiversity, however, which follow an approximate 62 million-year cycle. As reported in Science news, a new theory seems to explain periodic mass extinctions. The new theory found that oscillations in the Sun relative to the plane of the Milky Way correlate with changes in biodiversity on Earth. The researchers suggest that an increase in the exposure of Earth to extragalatic cosmic rays causes mass extinctions. Here is the original paper describing the finding."

Money will say more in one moment than the most eloquent lover can in years.