Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Guilty much? (Score 5, Informative) 685

by Main Gauche (#34440038) Attached to: Graduate Students Being Warned Away From Leaked Cables

it surprises me that the government wants their potential employees to be less informed than the general public.

And as it turns out, that is not the case at all. Imagine that, a completely misleading summary on slashdot.

Summary says: :The US State Dept has started to warn potential recruits from universities not to read leaked cables,"

TFA says: Columbia University career services got a recommendation from an alumnus that if you want a job with the State Dept, he recommends
"you DO NOT post links to these documents nor make comments on social media sites such as Facebook or through Twitter. Engaging in these activities would call into question your ability to deal with confidential information, which is part of most positions with the federal government."

So,
(1) This is not official policy; it is an alumnus giving personal advice to undergrads at his alma mater.
(2) It has nothing to do with reading/not reading wikileaks.

I really have to spend less time reading /. summaries.

Comment: Re:While i like the reference, utilitarian reality (Score 1) 345

by Main Gauche (#34083108) Attached to: Texas Supreme Court Cites Mr. Spock

Utilitarianism negates free will, property rights and individuality when misapplied (and perhaps when correctly applied too).

Meanwhile, free will, property rights, and individuality negate everything else when misapplied (and definitely when correctly applied too).

Everything is a tradeoff; that's life.

I'm just amazed that there's a court in the U.S. that doesn't subscribe to the opposite fundamentalist philosophy: sacrifice everything for the weakest. But given that one exists, I'm not surprised it's Texas.

In the long run we are all dead. -- John Maynard Keynes

Working...