Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:The ultimate big data challenge (Score 1) 85

by MagickalMyst (#48466353) Attached to: New Snowden Docs Show GCHQ Paid Telcos For Cable Taps
"...via all the corrupt politicians they have caught and not reported."

Controlling politicians is big business.

The expose The Franklin Cover Up by former Senator John Decamp exposes high ranking politicians, clergymen and businessmen using and abusing children (mostly boys) regularly and sadistically.

These abuses are often recorded and then used to compromise powerful individuals.

Pedophilia is literally the fabric that binds the system together - which is also why these sickos keep getting off (no pun intended!).

It happens in every country. In Canada, these activities were exposed by whistle-blowing police officer Perry Dunlop.

In the UK, there are ongoing scandals which will likely end with little to no convictions and hundreds of abused victims with no justice or compensation.

In Belgium there is the famous Mark Dutroux case. Dutroux admitted to procuring children (mainly little girls) for "high ranking officials in police and government".

These pedophile rings operate 24/7 and involve some of the most prominent members of society and are always covered up.

With the seemingly limitless global surveillance technology, it would be folly to think that the 'five eyes' are unaware of these crimes - much less that they would actively investigate and convict these child rapists.

One of the more disturbing 'government sponsored' activites, is the CIA program The Finders, exposed by former FBI special agent, (the late) Ted Gunderson.

To make the changes required for humanity to truly evolve, these pedophiles need to be exposed and convicted.

Please, think of the children.

Comment: Re:Moon landing evidence? (Score 0) 65

by MagickalMyst (#48457889) Attached to: Conglomerate Rock From Mars: (Much) More Precious Than Gold
I don't know whether the Apollo moon landings were faked or not; I wasn't around in 1969. However, I never used to question it.

But after people started questioning it and bringing up some very interesting points, I do question it too. Believing something simply because the masses believe it is not proof. It is foolishness.

However, if your belief is that the Apollo moon landings were legitimate, then please explain to me how the astronauts got through the Van Allen belt? And why are there so many doctored pictures of the moon landings?

Comment: Moon landing evidence? (Score -1) 65

by MagickalMyst (#48457511) Attached to: Conglomerate Rock From Mars: (Much) More Precious Than Gold
This reminds me of the Mythbusters TV show that attempted to bust the myth that the Apollo moon landings were faked.

There were 2 problems with that episode:

1. Multiple light sources on the moon - this was explained as the 'properties of the composition of rock' on the moon. However, NASA did not provide Mythbusters with any real moon rock samples. Instead, they provided some substance that they claimed 'had a similar makeup' to the 'reflective' moon rocks for the Mythbuster's test. Perhaps they should redo their test with some 'authentic' $10000/gram moon rock?

Think about it: If you were investigating the credibility of someone, would you take their word over verifyable scientific proof? How do we know for sure that the NASA 'artificial' moon rock is the same as the rock on the moon? Who can verify this?

2. The Van Allen radiation belt. There is no mention at all on Mythbusters as to how the Astronauts made it though the VA belt. AFAIK, it would have been impossible to survive. Yet, not a scratch on the Astronauts flying to the moon with 60's technology.

I used to be a huge fan of NASA as a kid. As I got older, I realized that NASA has about as much credibility as 21st century governments.

Between infinite and short there is a big difference. -- G.H. Gonnet

Working...