Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: My experience (Score 1) 876

by MadShark (#46195735) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Why Are We Still Writing Text-Based Code?

I mostly write C and C++ code these days, but I've worked a lot with guys using Simulink and Labview. Both are good tools, but like any "programming" language, there are issues. Some of them stem from the lack of software processes being used by people who have never been exposed to a typical software development process. Simple things like version control, or "code" reviews. My experience with Labview in particular, is that the ease of changing the graphical representation encourages people to quickly tweak something to make it work. I've ended up in the situation where I asked what they changed to make it work, and they can't tell me. This is as much a lack of rigor in the process as it is in the people using the tool. They can often do amazing things, and quickly, but they tend to be difficult to maintain.

My experience with Simulink is a little different. The guys working with Simulink tend to be domain experts, often with PhDs. They really know their stuff. When they can generate a good model of the system they can do AMAZING things. The downside is you can spend millions of dollars developing and validating the system models. It is why you see Simulink used in projects with tough control systems problems, which coincidentally often have large budgets, like the automotive world.
Sometimes, the code generated by SImulink isn't efficient, which can drive up memory/CPU costs. When you are shipping hundreds of thousands or millions of a product a year, adding a few cents per unit really adds up. Sometimes the cost of spending an extra million or two writing the code in C(or optimizing the Simulink after the fact) is worth the expense. My opinion is that tools like Simulink will eventually take over the control systems market.

Another reason is cost. You can get a C compiler for free. Matlab/Simulink is a 6-figure expense per developer. Labview isn't that expensive, but it is still not cheap.

Comment: Re:I'm curious to see how many retailers actually (Score 5, Insightful) 732

by MadShark (#42701939) Attached to: Credit Card Swipe Fees Begin Sunday In USA

Cash is faster? You must be joking. For the vast majority of my credit card transactions these days, I swipe the card while they are ringing up my purchases and walk away as soon as they finish. Most of my charges are under $50, so most of the places I shop don't even require a signature. Even when they do, my signature takes far less time than handing them cash, them fiddling around getting me change out of the drawer and handing it back.

Comment: Re:To streamline future posts (Score 3, Insightful) 311

by MadShark (#40421415) Attached to: Tesla Delivers First Batch of Model S Electric Sedans

I think you should go back and do some actual calculations. About 30 seconds of googling tells me that standard, commercially available solar panels for making roughly 700 kWh a month would cover about 400 square feet. The combined area of my garage and relatively small house is over 2000 square feet.

The battery back on the base Tesla S is a 40 kWh battery pack. With a 400 square foot system, it should produce enough energy to charge a Tesla battery pack about 17 times in a month. That should get you about 2500 miles in a month.

Seems like plenty of room on my roof to charge an electric car, if I wanted to. I would just need to solve the problem of my car not being there during the day when the panels produce most of their energy.

Comment: Re:Feynman - Books and Covers (Score 1) 446

by MadShark (#39239081) Attached to: Math Textbooks a Textbook Example of Bad Textbooks

So computer science, and electrical engineers should learn base 2, base 16, and maybe base 8. I would even go so far as to make everyone learn converting between base 10 and one other base so they learn the concept. 99% of people are never going to need to do base conversions, and of the remaining 1%, they are pretty damn unlikely to need to convert between base 5 and base 7. Humans work with base 10 for good reason.

Comment: Re:It's not just the textbooks (Score 5, Informative) 446

by MadShark (#39239029) Attached to: Math Textbooks a Textbook Example of Bad Textbooks

Uggg. I had several teachers in college that wrote their own "textbooks" for their classes(electrical engineering). They were extraordinarily smart individuals, but their writing sucked. They were desperately in need of a technical writer and an editor. The ones that didn't completely suck were not any better than the normal books I had for my other classes.

Comment: Re:Much More Important -- Smart Socket can save li (Score 1) 284

by MadShark (#39041143) Attached to: Sony Outlets Control Electricity Through Authentication

When I added onto my house, they of course used the arc-fault breakers. About one out of every three times you shut off the vacuum cleaner when it is plugged into one of these outlets, it trips. Two different corded drills do the same thing, only they are closer to 50% of the time. I replaced the breaker with a different one. Same thing. Very annoying.

Comment: Re:Chasing the sun (Score 1) 473

by MadShark (#38553640) Attached to: Edison Would Have Loved New Light Bulb Law, Says His Great-Grandson

I've switched over most of my house to CFLs. I gave up in the bathroom, as EVERY brand I have been able to get locally seem to die about twice as fast as the incandescent bulbs and they cost more. They seem to deteriorate quickly as far as warm-up time and light quality. I'd like to replace the halogens in my living room with something a bit more efficient, but I haven't found anything equivalent yet. All the CFL and LED bulbs put out a lot less lumens than the halogens.

Comment: Re:CFL are no savings - bzzt wrong... (Score 1) 990

by MadShark (#36738966) Attached to: Congress Voting To Repeal Incandescent Bulb Ban

What brand are you using in your bathroom? I've been trying to use a mix of incandencent and CFLs in my light bar. I've tried every CFL brand I could find locally and they all suck. Most of them have had a shorter lifespan the the incandencents that they are right next to. They also take forever to warm up, and their light ouput drops off after about a month.

Comment: Re:Reducing illegal immigration? (Score 1) 202

by MadShark (#34453206) Attached to: Japanese Robot Picks Only the Ripest Strawberries

Farmers only using GPS assisted planting in ideal locations? I disagree. They are used all over the place, with great success. John Deere sells tons of these units for exactly this purpose every year. Other manufacturers have similar products. Farmers wouldn't spend tens of thousands of dollars on these setups if they didn't work. Also, cloud cover should not have a significant effect on GPS signal strength. The clouds are essentially transparent to the frequencies it uses.

Comment: Re:CFL vs Incandescent (Score 1) 310

by MadShark (#33699834) Attached to: Long Island Town Enacts Tough Cell Tower Limits

People keep saying that there are CFLs that reach full brightness almost immediately. Someone please tell me where I can get these mythical beasts. They absolutely are not available locally(city of 200,000 people). I've bought one of every brand that I could find locally, and ALL of them have noticeable output differences over the first 10-30 seconds. I still use them and they are better than the ones from a few years ago. I haven't gone so far to try and order them off the internet, but lets face it, 95% of people get what is cheap at their local retail store. If they aren't there, they don't get used, and the locally available ones are not that great.

CFLs definitely do last longer than incandescent bulbs in most cases. My experience is maybe three times longer in my best case. Maybe I have crappy power or something. The ones in the bathroom last about half as long as the incandescent bulbs, so I quit using them there.

The mercury thing doesn't really worry me that much, but the big difference is that the power plant isn't dropping the mercury on my floor when I drop a bulb.

Philogyny recapitulates erogeny; erogeny recapitulates philogyny.

Working...