NEVAH!

When the "The Producers" musical ran in Berlin, they weren't allowed (AFAIK, might be self-censorship) to use swastikas. Which was too bad, spoils the joke a bit.

Word.

Good idea. Though if "lab monkey" means "experimental subject" I'm afraid I don't need a job that much.

If your beasts are being fondled by the wrong persons, press charges for cruelty to animals.

Go for the original version of "The Gunslinger", not the revised one King published after otherwise finishing the series. Though the latter has more consistency with the other six volumes, the original version is told better and is a greater read. Oh, and if you're anything like me, prepare to be captivated, you'll want to read it all in one sitting.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11049316

Also, according to Danish news site politiken.dk, "there is no reason to believe he (Assange) committed rape, says Swedish Chief Prosecutor" (my translation, link: http://politiken.dk/udland/1041607/politi-wikileaksstifter-har-ikke-begaaet-voldtaegt-/ though the contents may be updated shortly)

No they haven't. "...paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the Government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell." (US Supreme Court Justice Hugo L. Black in the Supreme Court decision re the publication of the Pentagon Papers).

Avoiding possible public embarrasment is not a matter of national security and so is not just cause for hiding behind "security" classifications.

These disclosures appear to have nothing really new in them. Their importance is they provide corroboration for what is already known, in particular they document how much the Coalition governmets are lying. It's similar to the Pentagon Papers publication in that respect, and also in that the validity of these disclosures have been researched.by newspapers/magazines known for reasonable standards of journalistic integrity.