Comment: A repeat... (Score 1) 150
...of what destroyed Martian Civilization in 10,500 BC...
|
|
...of what destroyed Martian Civilization in 10,500 BC...
If Aurora exists, how come we can't make the X-51 work?
Oh wait... I know! It's a shell game, to throw everyone OFF the scent, to make them think we don't know what we're doing while we built something more spectacular than Aurora!
Now I got it!
"We shall SPY on to the end, we shall SPY in France,
we shall SPY on the seas and oceans,
we shall SPY with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall SPY our whatever the cost may be,
we shall SPY the beaches,
we shall SPY on the landing grounds,
we shall SPY in the fields and in the streets,
we shall SPY in the hills;"
-- paraphrasing, the GREAT Winston Churchill
My employer uses a computer to screen all incoming resumes. Unless your resume hits every single keyword in the job description, you're kicked out and never get seen by a human being.
And the company as a whole wonders why it's so hard to fill most positions...
And you hit the NAIL on the head as to why I have not gotten a job in 2 years. No matter how many times I've changed my "keywords". It IS the "employers" fault, and I am convinced of that.
You can see non gimicky 3D right now: Prometheus. Say what you will about the film, the 3D is not a gimmick, and greatly enhances the experience. I felt like I was looking at real person when Charlie was looking in the mirror and saw the thing in his eye. Creepy as fuck. The cesarian was also creepy as fuck in 3D as well, not because of in your face effects, but because you really felt as if you were right there looking at real people. That's the future of 3D: subtle enhancement.
Subtle Enhancement?
The only movie that was WORTH seeing in 3D in the last few years was AVATAR.
I saw Prometheus in 3D and saw no "subtle enhancement". The 3D visuals, did nothing for me. They did not detract from the movie, but neither did they justify the increased cost of the ticket. I felt like I was duped by a film-maker who said that he shot in 3D to make the film better.
As you can obviously surmise from my comments, I never go to 3D movies that have been up-converted, no matter what ridiculous budget the studio has spent on it. As the saying goes: "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame...."
BECAUSE of it's architecture, there are available "hacks" and other programs that allow you to far surpass anything that's on the market, and make it the central entertainment hub for the whole family. For those of us in the know, TiVo boxes and DirectTV boxes have been the gateways to entertainment freedom, almost completely freeing us from media that is not digital.
Now, if someone could just "port" iTunes to it, I'd be set (I can already stream my songs/movie/TV show purchases to it).
We all had that moment in school when a teacher would pose an "impossible" problem, thought to ourselves "Well, they've never faced ME before!", spent a few minutes toying with it and finally giving up.
Not necessarily true.
I remember sitting in class, in High School, maybe Junior High, and asked such a problem, and being the only one in a class of 45+ able to solve it,
BTW, my solution was unique, as in, the teacher had never seen it before. So, yeah, what Shouryya Ray did was VERY IMPRESSIVE, but, solving problems at 16? My mind was very agile back then. I've lost a lot since then.
When was the last time I read something from you?
He keeps differentiating, flying off on a tangent.