Comment: Re:Haught isn't in favor of creationism (Score 1) 717
Comment: Haught isn't in favor of creationism (Score 5, Informative) 717
Comment: Re:You are *assuming* this is why he's 'censoring' (Score 1) 943
Richard Dawkins, for instance, who is by now a champion of atheism, and has absolutely no need to do so, *still* resorts almost continuously to ad hominem attacks in his debates; the man does his homework (and rather seems to enjoy it, in fact).
I dispute this is the case. In no event of which I'm aware did Dawkins dispute a point by way of insulting his interlocutor. Go ahead and find a few examples and I'll consider relenting. In short, "Citation needed."
Theologian attempts censorship after losing public-> 3
Link to Original Source
$25 PC Prototype gets award at ARM TechCon->
The director of the Raspberry Pi foundation, Eben Upton, shown at the event, demonstrating the capabilities of one of the prototypes that have been built. From advanced graphics at 1080p HD resolution to simple web browsing and desktop productivity, the small boards with ARM-based processors and PoP SDRAM have proven to be very versatile, fast and durable.
The whole Raspberry Pi team and community are very happy for this prize and they all hope this results in big success for the project. Lets just wait for the final boards to be released."
Link to Original Source
Comment: The guy is running for the state house (Score 1) 179
So what is a state representative in an interior district of an interior state supposed to do about immigration policy exactly?
At best, the state house can decide what to do with those immigrants which are deemed illegal by federal law. Sure he has wiggle room there for some sort of policy. He could support draconian measures to kick everyone out or support "sanctuary" status for his jurisdiction. But really, Sean won't have much impact on this. The US Congress is where to go for that action.
Apple, AT&T sued for $360M over Visual Voicema->
Moreover, Klausner is also suing other companies for the same obvious feature. According to Reuters:
The company alleged in its statement that Cablevision's Optimum Voicemail, Comcast's Digital Voice Voicemail and eBay's Skype Voicemail violate Klausner's patent by allowing users to selectively retrieve and listen to voice messages via message inbox displays.
How long will such patently preposterous patent suits be allowed merely because a feature that seems obvious to technology developers may not seem obvious to judges and juries? I remember that my first college computer (a crummy low-end Packard Bell manufactured in 1995) came with answering machine software installed by default. Is there no example of prior art for using Caller ID, a modem, and a computer to tag messages before Klausner's filing date of 1994?"
Link to Original Source
Adding Capsaicin Improves Anesthetic Treatment 151
from the so-hot-it's-numb dept.
iPhone reportedly unchained from AT&T->
Link to Original Source