Comment: Re:Fairly well known issue (Score 1) 567
How you got that out of my post, I'll never know.
Quantum tunneling.
-l
|
|
How you got that out of my post, I'll never know.
Quantum tunneling.
-l
OK, so here's my incredibly stupid idea.
If you had access to a weather balloon, how much rocket would you need to eject an extremely small rover (RC car sized) out of Earth orbit onto an eventual moon landing?
Imagine the tiny rover is in a bouncy shell thing that will unfurl when it lands. Imagine you only care that the rover lands in under 5 years.
Call it a semipro moon bounce. Is this at all feasible?
-l
I'll plug my phone in at work
Oooo, or space heater.
-l
Interesting. Hadn't really considered the fact they're usually on the ceiling which is kind of obvious. Still, one plus is that they heat (near) where you need it, like a space heater, versus burning gas/oil for a whole house (or worse, electric furnace). As you probably know, 4 75W bulbs plus a human body will heat a small room (10x10) in no time and since you want the heat, it's not a negative. I absolutely agree that one or two 60W in a large open floorplan is not very efficient vs central heating.
That gives me a crazy idea for a transparent laminate floor, heated with a zillion incandescent bulbs underneath. If I knew Blender, I might do a 3D scene of that just for fun.
I live in Austin, TX, and am just speculating about cold climates. Take it with a road full of salt.
-l
If engineers worked like doctors worked, you'd need a licensed professional engineer with a PhD to install a wireless router in your home.
Yeah, and don't get me started on the butt-chewing I got over changing the yellow fluorescent bulbs at work with daylight spectrum ones. Physical plant genuinely suggested you needed to be a licensed electrician to do it.
Fer cryin' out loud.
-l
Well, you can also add in cold climate vs warm climate costs. In Texas, CFL or LED wins because your A/C runs less. I imagine if you live in North Dakota, the incandescents would win.
-l
It may be following the conventions of an old Unix desktop environment that I'm not remembering
What, like TWM with Athena widgets or something? Heck, even today, you can launch xsane and other X programs and see the many-window model. The Unix model was more about multiple desktops with windows arranged however you felt like than one desktop with single-window applications you could pop up or minimize. You just switched the desktop and voila, new program[s], new windows, arranged however it was you arranged them.
The web browser specifically made this an untenable model after awhile. Having 16 Netscape windows open got annoying quick and you didn't necessarily keep 16 virtual desktops around unless you used Enlightenment... but I digress. Application switchers were useful for management. But I would argue that tabbed windows really made things saner.
I keep 5 virtual desktops. 3 are fullscreen application specific, 2 are general. I remap my shortcuts to Alt+F1 - Alt+F5 for switching because it's nicer than arrowing or whathaveyou.
Whew that was longer than intended.
-l
CEOs can quantify their value in real dollars and that's how they get paid.
The problem with CEO pay is that this is precisely what is NOT happening. Only recently have large shareholders started to get a clue on this vast waste of their capital.
-l
Yeah - I'd find the prospect of hiring a 10 yr old a bit of a leap as well.
You'd make a poor robber baron.
-l
Often things ARE as bad as they seem!