How is it wrong? The article is about a 2008 document. It was merely reporting what was in it.
Sure you can. This guy is a fucking twit same with the submitter.
Collectively, we can't move forward if we grant a monopoly on "legitimate" discrimination to one particular group of people (the political correctness crowed, for example).
You gave yourself away too easily. This just some rambling bigotry from some right-wing nutter. Being against institutionalized bigotry has nothing to do with this nonsense. No one believes this outside possibly a few fringe nutters and caricatures created by the very bigots themselves. Nothing is more funny than listening to them trying to paint themselves as the victims of "PC".
The people like cold fjord who would continually piss themselves over "Mooslem" boogeymen without Big Brother tucking them in at night. 9/10 chance that this "anonymous" person is cold fjord.
They're trying to increase page hits and ad impressions on the BI sites that next to no one cares about. It's one of those Dice.com side effects.
especially if game developers start to ditch Windows
Hahahahahaha! Good joke! Ditch 99% of their customers in PC game market? Yeah, right. Even Valve doesn't even believe this nonsense otherwise it would have already gone Linux-only. Gabe is saber rattling because knows freetards can't sustain his business.
Yes, hence why it was stupid that the "editor" did not pick up on it and fix it. As you said, it's glaringly obvious.
That was meant to be "second to last full paragraph".
Yeah, it's a typo. The privacy report says in the last full paragraph on page 13:
As it can't be ruled out that the published Windows executable of TrueCrypt 7.0a is compiled from a different source code than the code published in “TrueCrypt 7.0a Source.zip” we however can't preclude that the binary Windows package uses the header bytes after the key for a back door.
Seems the author retyped the statement themselves rather than just copying and pasting then the summary carried it over.
Yeah was just about to make the same post. That sentence sounds pretty stupid.
To further explain, your statement is akin to calling MP3 a DRM scheme. AAC is simply an audio codec standard.
You have to excuse Timmeh. He'a an idiot. PengPod doesn't give any such "guarantee". Timmeh just thinks he's smart and witty by inserting the NSA into the topic.
Link not length.
Except I'm not ignoring anything. My statements are based on actual statements from officials in the administration, declassified documents and info from FOIA requests. Do you have proof that Paul O'Neill was lying? Or can you at all provide evidence to dispute my second length based on declassified documents and FOIA requests? All you seem to have is ad homs.