Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Dual Carbon Battery Charges 20 Times Faster Than Lithium-Ion

Submitted by Luminary Crush
Luminary Crush (109477) writes "A Japanese company, Power Japan Plus, has announced plans to put into mass production a carbon-carbon ("dual carbon") battery later this year. Developed jointly with Kyushu University, the new battery has high energy density, is very safe and reliable, can sustain 3000 charge cycles, and is environmentally sustainable. If dual carbon batteries were installed in a Nissan Leaf the car could be completely charged in 12 minutes."

+ - Fusion power by 2020? Researchers say yes and turn to crowdfunding. 1

Submitted by Luminary Crush
Luminary Crush (109477) writes "To date, the bulk of fusion research has been channelled towards a plasma containment and stabilization method. This is the approach used by ITER's tokamak reactor, the cost of which could exceed US$13.7 billion before it's online in the year 2027 (barring further delays). Researchers at LPP Fusion, in a project partially financed by NASA-JPL, are working in a different direction: focus fusion, which focuses the plasma in a very small area to produce fusion and an ion beam which could then be harnessed to produce electricity. It small enough to fit in a shipping container, can double as a rocket engine, and would cost US$50 million to produce the working 5 MW prototype. To reach the next hurdle and demonstrate feasibility, LPP Fusion has started an Indiegogo campaign to raise $200K."

Comment: A more informative article on the discovery (Score 1) 168

by Luminary Crush (#43008165) Attached to: Long-Lost Continent Found Under the Indian Ocean

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-21551149

Researchers have found evidence for a landmass that would have existed between 2,000 and 85 million years ago.

This potentially places the landmass above sea level during a time when humanity could have been present on it.

Comment: I'm not sure how much of a game-changer this is (Score 1) 280

by Luminary Crush (#42612397) Attached to: Meet "Ophelia," Dell's Plan To Reinvent Itself

It's from Wyse, so it's basically a "thin client". Don't get me wrong, Wyse makes good thin clients, but it's not fundamentally different than anything out there already. It's basically a way to run "VDI" (Virtual Desktop Interface) from your pocket.

OK, cool enough, but I can already do that with an app on my smart phone. I can run a plethora of thin client software - Citrix, VMware, Webex, PCAnywhere, Microsoft RDP, VNC... what else? The only unique thing I see here is that you can attach to a larger external screen. With an iPhone you can do that via an Apple TV with mirroring. The experience isn't fantastic but it's only a matter of time for that architecture to improve (same with Android equivalents).

I do not see myself carrying yet another device. I could see myself using my phone this way if the external graphics worked better - and there is nothing technically stopping that from happening now.

Apple or Google/Android could blink and destroy the market for this device.

+ - Spinning solar cells - a new take on photovoltaics->

Submitted by Luminary Crush
Luminary Crush (109477) writes "Spinning solar cell units created by V3 Solar promise a 20x increase in cell efficiency. All material science and concentrator advances of the last 10 years seem like small refinements in comparison. Is this the breakthrough we've all been waiting for, or is it just another technological let down waiting to happen?
Watch their introductary video here: How exactly does this new spin on solar work?"

Link to Original Source

Comment: Inside the floating dock with the Sea Shadow (Score 1) 124

by Luminary Crush (#39839755) Attached to: Navy To Auction Stealth Ship

Pretty cool. The ship was locked up though, so I only got to check out the outside. It's bigger than you'd think.

Sea Shadow in the floating dock

From what I understand they tried to find a museum for the ship but there were no takers. The dock was in rusty/poor condition, but the ship looked garage-kept ;-)

Comment: Re:french military victories (Score 1) 600

by Luminary Crush (#38936173) Attached to: India Turns Down American Fighter Jets, Buys From France

This is complete nonsense. There were more Nazi sympathizers in the US than in France at the time. Some of our 'captains of industry' were helping Germany build it's war machine.

When defeat was inevitable some in France looked around themselves - the British had been decimated on land and had retreated to their island. The US was uninterested. On France's borders were fascist Germany, fascist Spain, fascist Italy, aloof Switzerland and occupied territory. It looked as though Britain would fall quickly (few thought they could hold on alone as they did at the time) and that the new world order would be one of fascism or communism. It was a dark day, and in those times some people will choose a dark side versus the unknown.

And then come the opportunists - you have those kind in any country, who will gravitate to the winning side in hopes for gains for themselves.

Comment: Re:french military victories (Score 1) 600

by Luminary Crush (#38936009) Attached to: India Turns Down American Fighter Jets, Buys From France

Well...not really. The "Schlieffen Plan" was the move through the Netherlands and Belgian plain, but that was not really what happened in WW2 - it was not the 'second time Germany pulled the same trick'. In WW2 the Germans 'faked' the Schlieffen Plan and lured the French and British into a trap.

The Schlieffen plan *WAS* anticipated by the French and British, and they placed the best of their units along the Belgian border. The Belgians were supposed to have allowed French and British troops to move into Belgium into forward prepared positions, but Belgium decided to declare neutrality until invaded (in some foolish hope that Germany would prefer to pound it's head against the French Maginot Line to the south instead). Silly Belgians.

As soon as Germany invaded Belgium the French troops were allowed to cross the border, but now were not able to reach their designated defensive positions (Germany having gotten a head start) and had to have meeting engagements in the field (losing the defender advantage).

However, THIS was the trick. The main German effort was planned to occur through the forests just to the NORTH of the Maginot Line, but also SOUTH of the more open land considered better suited for the warfare. The French and British thought the Ardennes forest was impassable to tanks, and as such put 2nd class divisions (with very few tanks) and reserve troops guarding it. So, as the British and French raced into Belgium to encounter what they thought was the main German attack (in a Schlieffen Plan replay), the real thrust was happening to the south of them. They were soon caught in a salient - a 'bulge' - and quickly the best Allied units were vulnerable to being cut off.

Despite being warned by their own reconnaissance aircraft and captured plans from a downed German aircraft, they ignored the Ardennes until it was too late. By then the Germans had a solid advance going, which thereafter cut off the Allied troops with amazing speed for the time (eg Blitzkrieg).. then there was Dunkerque and the loss of all the equipment of two major armies. 300,000 troops did manage to escape, including 100,000 French.

Now that the Germans had knocked out the British Army and defeated the best of the French units in the north, they turned south. They met occasional stiff resistance but now they severely outnumbered the French units and the end was only a matter of time.

Contrary to some popular beliefs, the Maginot Line was never breached from the front (once surrounded a few smaller forts were captured) and the French had more tanks with better armor and guns than the Germans did. The defeat was really one of leadership, strategy and tactics.

Comment: VMware and Citrix (Score 1) 523

by Luminary Crush (#37125920) Attached to: Why PCs Trump iPads For User Innovation

... and several other vendors deliver desktops and apps to end-user devices remotely and increasingly efficiently. TFA is on the wrong side of history - IT will own and control the apps "locked down" and delivered remotely, device-independently. Administration of the endpoint device is a nightmare, and through VDI and app delivery endpoint management is becoming nearly irrelevant as these technologies improve. In fact, the end point becomes irrelevant - the always-on, use anywhere application service is coming (just don't say "cloud" because I'm tired of hearing it).

All your apps are belong to us.

If at first you don't succeed, you must be a programmer.

Working...