Have you tried looking at it without pushing your face into the screen yet?
This law is not new. It has significant amount of legal precedent already established. You will have to demonstrate why expanding the definition will suddenly bring up selective enforcement where there hasn't been any to push this argument.
Yes, you keep making that claim. That you are a "professional working in the field".
As I have pointed out in the past, that title in your case can only be true if you're either:
1. A cleaner or similar non-power related job at a power plant.
2. PR person for renewables who's main job is to spin the narrative.
3. An actual professional in the field who can't get a job because of his utter incompetence coupled with extreme, almost religious anti-reality opinions.
Anyway, keep on trying to spin the narrative.
Don't be obtuse. Overwhelming majority of vaccines are well out of patent protection date and as such exceptionally cheap. As a result, instead of "big pharma", they're typically produced by copy drug makers around the world, both large and small.
I can imagine. That sort of stuff is usually posted by 12-year olds who can't articulate points well, but love people who do. This is why you get
Even when their points are in direct conflict with reality and physics, like yours. Considering your posting history, and you actually telling pretty much every single professional in the field that they are wrong when they point the factual errors which turn your conclusions 180, I've learned not to engage you any more.
A good example was your last batch of stupidity, where you suggested that everyone is moving towards gearless wind turbines after I and several others pointed out some significant problems with your claims in relation to durability of wind turbines. I asked you who is, you told me that GE is already done moving and is mostly gearboxless. I linked you GE's current product list of their wind turbines which was overwhelmingly turbines with gearboxes, and you told me that this was clearly a lie and you know better than GE itself what GE is making.
So I'm sure you get fan mail from equally opinionated people who have a severe problem with reality and are simply not as good at being convincing liars as you are.
And of course, that ends when you fact check your statements, at which point you become a simple liar. A point of which I make a point to notify people of when you answer these threads now.
Anyone who isn't yet aware of your trolling habits in all discussions on renewables only needs to click on your name to see your extremely opinionated ignorant trolling to the point of you denying laws of physics to peddle your agenda.
You should really change your handle if you want to have any kind of impact nowadays. This one is pretty tarnished.
Yes to the latter question. "Had" being past tense in the key problem.
You miss the main point. It's easier to monetize on their OS because their OS reports a whole lot more information to them than another OS.
So in other words, you do in fact understand that AM receiver antenna can be only a few centimeters long.
If you do understand it, why did you claim otherwise in your initial post? Posting a wall of related physics to demonstrate that you're not a total idiot was required here I suppose, since you did manage to make an utterly ridiculous claim, but it doesn't nullify your original claim in any way.
This was your exact quote:
"> most FM receivers also have AM receiver function
Which require an antenna several meters long. "
And while you have demonstrated that you understand that you emitted a total brain fart there, you could at least admit to it if you're going to demonstrate understanding of underlying physics after you're called on it.
You obviously have no clue then. It's extremely costly to maintain a stable grid. Overwhelming majority of people in the world have it worse than you or I. And at certain point, service is so good that improving it further starts to carry significant diminishing returns. In most Western countries, that is the situation with the grid.
They have vested interest in mobile now because it's much more effective to monetize through their own dominant OS.
This has nothing to do with Samsung, it has everything to do with tech process problems which spread well beyond the mobile. Case to point: desktop GPUs.
And once you comprehend that having stable power has actual value, you comprehend why your suggestion is ludicrous.
Something tells me that you need to live in a developing country for a while to understand what "poorly maintained grid" actually means.
Right now, you're raging because that delicious cake that was delivered to you had a slightly stale cherry on top.
The ignorant bullshit spewing of angelosphere continues.