Comment: Re:The Princess Bride? (Score 2) 516
Comment: Re:You know... (Score 1) 611
Comment: Re:So just like the old Sears crap? (Score 2) 532
I'm genuinely surprised, and faintly horrified, to find someone using Best Buy as an example of good retail practice. In the past few years they have been caught misrepresenting products, selling used products as new, setting up a fake website with inflated prices, and otherwise behaving like dishonest scum.
Comment: Re:But does it change anything? (Score 1) 217
The phrase is 'blind-sided.'
Comment: Re:Help a neighbor (Score 1) 570
Comment: Re:The Original (Score 1) 192
My bad - I posted after reading the existing comments. and I guess I lost track of that important detail.
However, my piano is a digital Roland, hooked up to all sorts of MIDI stuff and to my computer, so it may still qualify.
I'd much rather it were a 1920's Steinway, but I have neither the space nor the budget for a really nice piano.
Comment: The Original (Score 3, Insightful) 192
Comment: Re:It is a payrope (Score 1) 179
The NYT allows me 20 free articles a month, so your numbers are suspect.
However, that limit does not include articles linked from, for example, Google News or any Google search. Which makes it fairly easy to get around.
Comment: Re:"Quikster" split a dumb move to begin with (Score 2) 253
Comment: Re:An obvious reminder (Score 1) 182
Comment: Re:Good test. (Score 1) 204
U.S. postal regulations explicitly state that if you receive unsolicited goods in the mail, they are yours to do with as you wish - you have no obligation to the sender. The liability is always with the sender. This is to discourage certain obvious scams.
If something is delivered to you which is clearly intended for someone else (i.e., right address, wrong name), things might get more complicated. I don't know the legalities in that case.
George Lucas At It Again->
Link to Original Source