Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Compelling, but a mix still better... (Score 1) 394

by Lord Lemur (#48198749) Attached to: NASA's HI-SEAS Project Results Suggests a Women-Only Mars Crew

If the conclusion of a study was that sending women to space was inefficient, there would be plenty of people screaming that it was sexist. This study, like all mono-culture solutions involving human endeavor says more about the opinions of those writing the conclusion then what the optimal solution would be. In all of my years, I have never been involved in any mission, plan or project that couldn't receive the benefits of more diverse viewpoints and experience In my experience, this is true for warfare, public service, private service, charity work; anything that requires people to work together to solve problems. People of different backgrounds, cultures, genders, ect. provide very large intangible benefits that contribute to success. Saying that one class of people should be excluded from a difficult endeavor because they eat more is very short sighted.

Comment: Re:Score one for the other team (Score 1) 173

by Lord Lemur (#48004281) Attached to: Solar System's Water Is Older Than the Sun

Whether such phenomena are "truly random" or not (a bit of a paradox for a supposedly generally-deterministic physics), or, say, a perfect back-door to controlling all of physical reality that an insightful engineer might put in, or, say a God, is a metaphysical question. But that it can happen is clear, as a matter of science.

One of these, vaccum fluctuations, has the ability to predict something and is theoretically testable thus science, the other is god. The problem with your myth of choice is that it is a myth of the gaps. It can only exist where we don't yet know the answer. When we find the answer it will retreat further. There isn't any sort of rational experiment we can preform to prove it's existance, and it has absolutely no predictive power whatsoever. It is faith in that it is a useless expendeture of intelectual power to try and defend.

All that being said, if it makes you a better person, or makes you feel good, or whatever, by all means god it up. Please, however don't insist that other's pretend it is valid or rational.

Comment: Re:Oh good (Score 1) 907

by Lord Lemur (#48003557) Attached to: Miss a Payment? Your Car Stops Running

Kill?

The alternative MIGHT be to not lend money to people with bad credit scores. Would THAT be better?

In many cases, yes.

Having wages more inline with productivity would be much better. The types of loans being discussed here, came into being after we decoupled minimum wage from worker productivity per hour, and started the long decline of real median incomes relative to productivity per capita, but fixing demand side issue like that is so out of vogue.

"Don't discount flying pigs before you have good air defense." -- jvh@clinet.FI

Working...