Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Not necessarily hate (Score 1) 1482

by Logic Bomb (#46632697) Attached to: OKCupid Warns Off Mozilla Firefox Users Over Gay Rights

Based on that set of axioms, it can be completely loving to encourage someone to repent of his sins and choose to follow Jesus. Practicing homosexuality is a sign that someone isn't doing that. It would therefore be unloving or even hateful to affirm homosexual relations.

He didn't "encourage someone to repent". He contributed money to an effort to institutionalize oppression in the law. His actions affected others, so those who disagree are entitled to do the same.

Comment: Re:Are people not allowed to have opinions? (Score 1) 1482

by Logic Bomb (#46632561) Attached to: OKCupid Warns Off Mozilla Firefox Users Over Gay Rights

But in no way do I support the demonization or boycott of people just because they have a different opinion of something than I do.

This isn't about someone's opinion of wheat bread. This is about oppression based on a common genetic characteristic, and one that isn't anyone else's problem (as opposed to something like psychopathy). The struggle for gay rights absolutely, unquestionably, is analogous to the struggle for civil rights for african americans. You would have been against the Montgomery bus boycott?

Comment: Re:Is this the 90s!? She's been trolling for years (Score 2) 376

The brilliant and hilarious political writer Molly Ivins wrote the ultimate takedown of Camille Paglia's absurd intellectual methods (20 years ago!). Archive.org has a PDF of the original article from Mother Jones magazine.

If you plan to read it, ignore the rest of this comment, but if you're not going to follow the link, here's the final paragraph of the article:

There is one area in which I think Paglia and I would agree that politically correct feminism has produced a noticeable inequity. Nowadays, when a woman behaves in hysterical and disagreeable fashion, we say, "Poor dear, it's probably PMS." Whereas, if a man behaves in a hysterical and disagreeable fashion, we say, "What an asshole." Let me leap to correct this unfairness by saying of Paglia, Sheesh, what an asshole.

Comment: Whatever Apple uses with iPhoto (Score 1) 350

by Logic Bomb (#39930621) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Best Option For Printing Digital Photos?

Every time I've done prints at local store, the color has been awful. Sometimes the image itself turns grainy. The prints I order through iPhoto are wonderful, though I haven't ordered in a few months. I believe they were using Kodak's service, which is getting handed over to Shutterfly?

Comment: Of course it'll happen (Score 2) 185

by Logic Bomb (#37765186) Attached to: Will Apple Let Siri and Apps Connect?

Apple is pretty predictable -- once they've started showing their hand. They consistently take successful ideas used in one place and expand them as far as possible. Successful user interface paradigms developed for one application later appear in others. The iOS App Store begat the Mac App Store. So it seems pretty obvious that Apple, having introduced Siri, will expand it.

Except for major OS releases to paid developer program members, Apple almost never releases anything with a "beta" label. Siri is labeled a beta, which surely is meant to indicate that more functionality is planned.

Comment: Oh, please. It's an obvious shape. (Score 1) 263

by Logic Bomb (#37654666) Attached to: Was the iPod Accessory Port Inspired By a 40-Year-Old Camera?

Let's say you have to design a connector for a device which is relatively thin, and is expected to get thinner in the future. Existing common connection standards like USB don't provide the functionality you want. What's the most obvious shape? How about a flat line?

Wow, amazing work. I don't think there's much inspiration required.

Comment: Apple isn't a software company (Score 1) 223

by Logic Bomb (#37049554) Attached to: Wall Street: Software More Valuable Than Oil

Apple's products are hardware-software bundles. Apple sometimes sells updated software to use on hardware you already bought from them. They also are a vendor of content -- none of which they create -- with the goal of making their hardware-software bundles even more appealing.

Stupid exceptions that don't change my argument:
  FileMaker (a mostly-ignored Apple subsidiary)
  You can use iTunes on Windows to purchase music & video and never put them on an Apple device. This wasn't the goal of the iTunes Music Store, and doesn't make much money for Apple.
  The legions of 3rd-party products Apple sells online and at their stores have nothing to do with this.

Comment: Are they counting free subscriptions? (Score 4, Informative) 117

by Logic Bomb (#35900528) Attached to: NYTimes.com Reports 100k Subscribers

I've had a nytimes.com login pretty much since they started requiring registration to view stories -- late 90s some time? Right after the paywall was announced, I got an email thanking me for being a long-time account holder and offering me a free year's subscription. I took their offer, of course. How many of those 100,000 subscribers are actually paying?

Comment: Re:They aren't doing this to snub the little guys. (Score 1) 146

by Logic Bomb (#34618614) Attached to: iBook Store Features Leave Indie Publishers Behind

That works if and only if Apple tells everyone that's what they're doing. While it may be likely based on past experience, you cannot safely assume a company will do anything in particular.

Innovation often doesn't come from the big guys. Experience so far with the App Store has certainly shown that. There's no good reason for Apple to only look at large publishing operations for input.

Comment: Charge for tethering is a complete rip-off now (Score 5, Insightful) 514

by Logic Bomb (#32464780) Attached to: Mixed Reception To AT&T's New Data Pricing Scheme

The ridiculous part is that they're still charging a fee to enable tethering. That sort of makes sense with an "unlimited" plan. Presumably, the plan price was based on an estimate of how much data you'd use. Since tethering will obviously drive up usage, that assumption is no longer valid. (This highlights the absurdity of so-called "unlimited" plans that aren't really.)

But now that you are paying for actual use, there's no excuse to charge anything for tethering. You've paid for 2 GB (or whatever), and it shouldn't matter how it gets used. If you use more, you pay more.

I'd really like to see a regulatory authority question that charge.

Comment: Changes affect all AT&T customers (Score 1) 670

by Logic Bomb (#32431420) Attached to: iPad Bait and Switch — No More Unlimited Data Plan

If you actually read the AT&T press release you'll find that this applies to all smartphone data plans. It's not just about iPhones. They're basically changing the iPad plans to match.

As of right now, Apple's iPad product page still refers to unlimited data plans. It's hard to imagine AT&T didn't notify Apple that this is coming, but it almost looks like they don't know.

Music

+ - How can a business end wrongful ASCAP shakedown?->

Submitted by Logic Bomb
Logic Bomb (122875) writes "A local coffee shop was recently forced to stop performances by unsigned musicians because ASCAP and other licensing groups insist the shop owes thousands of dollars in fees. The fees are a preemptive shakedown, supposedly owed because performers at the shop might play someone's copyrighted work. Despite the shop owner's efforts to clarify or negotiate, the licensing groups aren't budging. Who can a small business owner turn to for help in this situation? It doesn't really seem like an issue for the EFF. The ACLU seems like a possibility, but this problem isn't on their list of key issues. Anyone dealt with this before?"
Link to Original Source

Comment: Asimov himself said nothing happens in Foundation (Score 3, Interesting) 283

by Logic Bomb (#31122154) Attached to: Emmerich Plans <em>Foundation</em> As a 3D Epic

These are absolutely some of my very favorite books. But as I recall, Asimov's own foreword to the original trilogy makes the idea of a movie series seem pretty stupid. He started Foundation as a series of short stories. Years later, when a publisher was trying to persuade him to make a longer Foundation work, Asimov had to go back and re-read the material. He reports that, as he sat there reading, he kept waiting for something to happen in the story. He was right (of course): Foundation is mostly people have discussions. What kind of movie can you make out of that?

Comment: Re:Maybe it's just me (Score 1) 285

by Logic Bomb (#30099594) Attached to: TSA Changes Its Rules, ACLU Lawsuit Dropped

My understanding is that one of the primary issues in a civil case is whether there's even an issue that the court can decide. I believe one can ask a court to make a preemptive ruling. However, most of the time if there isn't actually a dispute the court won't hear the case. And since the TSA changed its policies, there's no longer a dispute.

Now, if the detained individual wants to file his own lawsuits for damages and that sort of thing, that's a different issue.

Never appeal to a man's "better nature." He may not have one. Invoking his self-interest gives you more leverage. -- Lazarus Long

Working...