I saw things done on the coCo that blew away the C64 in graphic.
Obviously you haven't kept up with the C64 demoscene. Might want to do that before you claim the CoCo had better graphics ability than the C64.
And it still did not cover up the fac tthat the CoCo floppy drive was 80X faster than the C64.
This could be mitigated through a number of ways with third-party products on the C64. Also, the C128 combined with 1571, 1581, or CMD drive had built-in fast serial.
Oh and the CoCo supported 4 of them out of the box.
No, it didn't. You had to buy a separate controller card in order to have support for even one drive, let alone four. The Commodore machines had built-in support for multiple floppy drives going all the way back to the PET, without the need for a disk controller. The original drive manuals always mentioned devices 8 through 11, and I think it's technically possible to use devices above 11.
Before you think I'm some anti-CoCo nut, I owned both a CoCo 2 and a C64 growing up. I know which machine I preferred. However, I did enjoy both, the CoCo did have its merits. However, to say that the CoCo was better than the C64 in technical ability is just pure fanboyism.