Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Fairly well known issue (Score 2, Insightful) 567

by Local ID10T (#40102607) Attached to: New Music Boss, Worse Than Old Music Boss

That is not a problem, its a paradigm shift.

The musicians who are making a living are doing it by performing music, instead of by selling recordings of music.

Recordings can be infinitely copied for very little cost (once the original is created). The market recognizes this even if the industry does not. Thus selling recordings is no longer profitable. Performances are so much more than a recording, and a recording of a performance falls far short of the experience. The market recognizes this as well, and thus performers get paid, recordings get copied, and artists who want to make a living do it by performing.

Comment: Re:This really needs to STOP! (Score 1) 79

One minute the U.S. is trying to pass internet surveillance legislation. The next it is Britain. Then Australia jumps on the bandwaggon. Now its Canada. ------- The people lobbying for this BS need to be fought decisively. Otherwise we can forget the "free" internet as we know it today.

What was the saying? "Soap Box... Ballot Box... Ammo Box."

You are using the Soap Box now. In some countries, the Pirate Party is gaining headway (Australia even has rumors of trying to elect Julian Assange to parliament) that would be the Ballot Box in use. For examples of the Ammo Box try a search for "Arab Spring".

The world is changing. Fighting is going on. Some of us are just at different stages of the fight.

Comment: Re:Another failed social project from Microsoft (Score 1) 135

And how would you create something like his so.cl site or DuckDuckGo with that kind of rate?

The preferred method is to call (or email) google and ask for free access for your project. Or you could apply to the summer of code project and see if you can get google to pay you.

Comment: Re:Redundant (Score 3, Informative) 721

by Local ID10T (#40043909) Attached to: Diesel-Like Engine Could Boost Fuel Economy By 50%

No I don't see all electric in 20 years.

Unless we solve the problems of...
1. Range
2. Recharge Time
3. Getting the Grid to handle all the cars.
4. How do we generate all that electricity to do so.

1. Range is increasing with every generation, and is already sufficient for 90% of daily needs.
2. Recharge time is also improving steadily, and is more a matter of infrastructure for convenience than time required. Recharge overnight at home, recharge during the day at the office, recharge while shopping, etc.
3 & 4. No clue - but I assume there are engineers working on solutions. Let them.

Range and Recharge time. is the biggest issue for me. I travel 30 miles to work and 30 miles back. That is 60 miles.

Charge at home overnight, charge at the office, you should have a mostly full charge when beginning either leg of your commute.

Most electric cars are pushing 100 miles, but that is the ideal range... what is the range going up a mountain?

Range will be effected by terrain -it is no matter your fuel source.

What if the batteries after 8 years are not optimal...

Batteries need to be replaced when they get old, oil needs to be changed, tires need to be replaced... its a fact: maintenance needs to be done.

Next my parents live 800 miles away. Say I have an electric car that can do 500 miles per run. I drive mostly there, however I need to recharge. Can I recharge in 5-10 minutes or will I need to spend the night charging my car. I do not have the money for a car to drive to work and a car to drive longer ranges. So we will still need chemical powered cars, until these issues are fixed. I am happy to see that they are getting a lot more fuel efficient.

The answer to these concerns is to rent a car for longer trips. I see Hertz has rental cars as low as $14 /day for some sort of econobox. I think my last multi-state driving vacation was about $150 for a week in a mercedes c240 (thanks to a free upgrade coupon).

That is a good sign, because electric cars are not going to solve all the problems.

Electric cars or hybrids do not have to be perfect. They need to be good enough for daily use - we use diesel rigs (18 wheelers) for hauling big loads, and dont say that because a honda civic cant haul the same load every day it isnt a viable commuter car. Different solutions for different problems.

Comment: Re:It just doesn't work (Score 2) 648

by Local ID10T (#39969487) Attached to: How Would Driver-less Cars Change Motoring?

There is no reason to have pedestrians and motor vehicles sharing the same space.

Use an overpass/underpass design to keep the cars away from where the pedestrians are. Designate actual bike paths, separate from walkways or motorways.

In areas with large amounts of foot traffic, such as downtown/shopping/dining districts put in car parks a block or two away, and allow only foot traffic -except for designated cargo loading access points (aka alleyways).

Comment: Re:obvious.... (Score 3, Insightful) 392

by Local ID10T (#39961835) Attached to: Adobe Introduces the Paid Security Fix

In a way, it is obvious...

if old version has a problem
and new version doesn't have (this particular) problem

then solution = buy the new version.

If it was the current release that was buggy, I would say they should put developers on a fix... If it is a flaw in an older version, that doesn't exist in the new version, then telling the customers to buy the current version is perfectly acceptable.

If they were already in development on the new version when they found out about a flaw in the current version... then its a decision about how much developer time it will cost to create a fix for the old (current) version and whether that time could be put to better use working on the new version. I deal with those kind of questions all the time at work myself. They are not easy.

"Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." -- Bernard Berenson

Working...