Nobody noticed that this article was published Friday, April 1, 2005? April Fools Day. And the moderators voted the parent up to a 5? Wow...
"Unless you adopt the (almost certainly nonsensical) position that everybody is entirely born, not made, you have to concede some degree of environmental influence on people's eventual properties(the degree of that influence is certainly a matter of debate; but almost certainly isn't zero)."
That is not a nonsensical position. Once you are born, your DNA does not change.
If you were not born a deep thinker, you will never naturally be a deep thinker, regardless of how much training or practice you have. You may be able to become good at deep thinking, possibly through practice or training, but you will never naturally be a deep thinker, since you were not born that way. That applies to everything in life. You are entirely born.
As for a person's ability to be able to use their personal abilities and skills to their fullest can be environmental and can be influenced by a number of factors including personal circumstances and upbringing. But again, a person who is born to take advantage of their situation will find a way to maximize their life and those who are not born that way will not, given identical circumstances.
While you make some good points, your arguments are inherently incorrect based upon your misunderstanding of creative problem solving. Here is a link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_problem_solving. Note the second sentence in the second paragraph. Problem solving as a whole is considered the most complex of all intellectual functions. Mathematical problem solving is considered one of the highest, if not the highest, forms of creative problem solving. Also consider for a moment that effectively the entire field of computer science was originally developed by Mathematicians.
I would argue that writing code is a purely analytical process. I would also argue that people who believe programming is purely an art form or is best suited for people who are not analytical, for example musicians, make terrible programmers. From my personal experiences, these kinds of people are at best "hacks" and tend to write average or below average code, which may or may not work. And that same code is almost always poorly designed, poorly architected, poorly implemented, poorly documented and poor performing. All of the people whom I've worked with who are Mathematicians, Engineers, Physicists, etc. who are also professional software engineers tend to write exceptionally good code. They also tend to have the appropriate analytical and creative problem solving skills necessary to provide appropriate solutions to extremely complex problems throughout all levels of development from architecture to implementation.
Getting back to the Wikipedia article, your misunderstanding is based upon the fact that while musicians may be creative, that does not mean they are creative problem solvers. Creative problem solvers though can be purely creative. Which correlates perfectly with my own personal experiences, since most highly analytical creative problem solvers I know also enjoy pursuing such subjects as art, design, music, etc. As a matter of fact, most of the people I work with enjoy photography outside of work, not music. And the opposite is true, people who are only musicians tend to be neither highly analytical nor decent problem solvers.
Claiming to be knowledgeable and intelligent is arrogant? What are you talking about?
Here are some definitions for you:
which has nothing to do with
Reading your entire post, it is clear you are insecure and trying to project your own inadequacies onto others.
Your current +4 Insightful rating is highly inaccurate.
This putback provides the ability to boot the Solaris Operating System from a ZFS root file system on both x86 and SPARC platforms. Full ZFS boot and install support will be available in a subsequent build. Because of the phased putback, we recommend waiting for the full boot and install support rather than attempting to use the ZFS boot features separately."
Link to Original Source
If you're a developer who loves solving problems and crafting code, here's your chance to show off your threading skills. Intel's experts have come up with twelve problem sets on a variety of topics from a Sudoku puzzle to a dorm room assignment problem. Meet the challenge by submitting the best multi-threaded code solution and win prizes.
Each month a new problem set will be open for competition and you can be the winner of a $100 USD Gift Card. Solve as many problem sets during the entire series to maximize your points and increase your chance to win the awesome grand prize of an Apple MacBook Pro laptop.
What you need to do
Just review each month's problem set and submit your code solution at the contest website. On the 21st of each month, Intel's panel of judges will review your final entry and assign points based on the following criteria:
Code Elegance: The organization of functions, methods, names of variables, documentation, or surprising use of an algorithm within the code.
Execution Timing: The "wall clock" time of execution of the application.
You also receive bonus points if you use the Intel® Threading Building Blocks and for participating in our contest discussion forums.
What you can win
The individual with the most points for the problem set will win a $100 USD AMEX or Visa gift card. The individual with the most points at the end of the series gets to take home the latest and greatest Apple* MacBook Pro laptop with the 15" screen.
Act fast! The 20th of each month is the deadline for submitting your entries to each problem set. So sharpen your pencils and show your peers how good of a developer you are.
Click here for the official contest website.
This contest is open to all participants worldwide. Check the contest website for additional contest terms and conditions."
Link to Original Source