Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:FreeBSD (Score 1) 755

by Lisias (#49091271) Attached to: Removing Libsystemd0 From a Live-running Debian System

Good. Can I replace any one of these so binaries, so I can get rid of a nasty security flaw?

Sure, why not? You will obviously have to make sure the service is restarted, but that is no different than with any other system.

WITHOUT RECOMPILING THE WORLD? =P

When I have a tool set of standalone applications, each one consuming the production of the other, it's easy to replace a single component (or recompiling a single component) without having to re-homologate everything.

But this is a Quality Team problem, and we are all developers, right? Fsck the Quality, right?

Allow me to rephrase my question to something less abstract: I want to get rid of DBUS. Can I do it?

This is about code, not people. At least it should be. You are the one that is opposed to the politics, yet you do not want to limit the discussion to the technical merits and want to instead focus on people?

If these people are writing the code, HELL YES!

So we should all not use politics, except if they fit into your agenda?

If by politics you mean "being or not cavalier about solving problems", HELL YES.

I don't care about who you vote. I don't care about what you believe.

I care about HOW YOU BEHAVE when you face a problem you created yourself (or are responsible for).

Being cavalier about your responsibilities is a important fact for me if I need to use your code.

I don't care if you call it politics or not.

Comment: Re:FreeBSD (Score 1) 755

by Lisias (#49091249) Attached to: Removing Libsystemd0 From a Live-running Debian System

Good. Can I replace any one of these so binaries, so I can get rid of a nasty security flaw?

Sure, why not? You will obviously have to make sure the service is restarted, but that is no different than with any other system.

WITHOUT RECOMPILING THE WORLD? =P

When I have a tool set of standalone applications, each one consuming the production of the other, it's easy to replace a single component (or recompiling a single component) without having to re-homologate everything.

But this is a Quality Team problem, and we are all developers, right? Fsck the Quality, right?

Allow me to rephrase my question to something less abstract: I want to get rid of DBUS. Can I do it?

This is about code, not people. At least it should be. You are the one that is opposed to the politics, yet you do not want to limit the discussion to the technical merits and want to instead focus on people?

If these people are writing the code, HELL YES!

So we should all not use politics, except if they fit into your agenda?

If by politics you mean "being or not cavalier about solving problems", HELL YES.

I don't care about who you vote. I don't care about what you believes.

I care about HOW YOU BEHAVE when you face a problem you created yourself (or are responsible for).

Being cavalier about your responsibilities is a important fact for me if I need to use your code.

I don't care if you call it politics or not.

Comment: Re:FreeBSD (Score 1) 755

by Lisias (#49067319) Attached to: Removing Libsystemd0 From a Live-running Debian System

monolithic design

Actually it is about 60 or so binaries, each doing some small and easy to grasp task.

Good. Can I replace any one of these so binaries, so I can get rid of a nasty security flaw?

I'm opposed to the cavalier attitudes of their lead developers.

This is about code, not people. At least it should be. You are the one that is opposed to the politics, yet you do not want to limit the discussion to the technical merits and want to instead focus on people?

If these people are writing the code, HELL YES!

Comment: Re:Pointless (Score 1) 755

by Lisias (#49067131) Attached to: Removing Libsystemd0 From a Live-running Debian System

Ever realised that it might actually be desired?

Yes. For 15 minutes, until I googled for articles explaining why systemd was a good idea, and had a hard time finding a convincing one.

Seriously, if you want to know if a new EFI system will be better to your pimped new car, you should ask people that earns their money by using it (racers), not car sellers or street users.

Comment: Re:Swatting is much more serious than a "prank" (Score 1) 327

by Lisias (#49008983) Attached to: Swatting 19-Year-Old Arrested in Las Vegas

So the SWAT teams are to be treated as paid hit men now? Are they being dispatched to resolve a problem, or just to kill people? Cause if it's just to kill people, wouldn't it be easier for the to just light the place on fire and train their weapons on the exit points?

The SWAT teams *are* paid hitmen : they hit bad guys and get paid for it. :-)

Comment: It's the economy, stupid! (Score 1) 628

by Lisias (#48644077) Attached to: What Happens To Society When Robots Replace Workers?

Once all (or most all) the work is being made by robots, who will receive salaries, that then will be spent on the goodies the robots are producing?

You see, you need CONSUMERS to earn money from them. And the government, TAXPAYERS - by the way.

Or they plan to "fix" this little problem by paying salaries to robots, giving them vacations, etc? =P

Comment: Re:Are you sure? (Score 1) 863

by Lisias (#48256325) Attached to: Debate Over Systemd Exposes the Two Factions Tugging At Modern-day Linux

so configure journald to simultaneously spit out text log files to syslog/rsyslog or you can export them to text files when you need them. its not hard.

Doubling the computing power needed to do something that I already had?

Increasing the risk of failure without adding nothing of value?

And yet, you got +1 Insightful points?

It is masked but always present. I don't know who built to it. It came before the first kernel.

Working...