Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:It's a barter transaction (Score 1) 353

by LehiNephi (#46622017) Attached to: If Ridesharing Is Banned, What About Ride-Trading?
Good point. There's also the issue of "how do I get credits in the first place?" or, "I don't own a car but still want to participate!" The obvious way would be for people to buy "miles", but that makes it even easier for the city governments to argue that it's still the same service.

Comment: Re:Good or Bad (Score 1) 715

by LehiNephi (#45939315) Attached to: How Good Are Charter Schools For the Public School System?
I think there's a false assumption here--that separating students into different schools based on academic performance is a Bad Thing. On the contrary, such segregation would enable the schools to tailor their teaching to the needs of their respective students. So the higher-performing students aren't held back due to a lower-performing student, and the lower-performing students don't feel lost because the teacher has to trying to teach an arbitrary curriculum at an arbitrary speed.

Comment: Re:Yeah, like the present school system is working (Score 1) 715

by LehiNephi (#45939279) Attached to: How Good Are Charter Schools For the Public School System?
There is one thing, however, which I don't know how we can fix, at least not from a legislative or policy standpoint, and that is the lack of parental participation.

While I agree with some of your points, I'll take issue with this statement. In my opinion, the lack of parental participation and school/legislative policy have degenerated in a vicious cycle. Schools try to do more to help kids, while discouraging/preventing parental influence on school policy. As a result, parents are less involved, which leads the school to do more, etc.

As for "day long day care" - so true. Look no further than the push for 4k and Head Start, which have repeatedly and consistently failed to produce lasting benefits, while costing taxpayers *billions*. There's no educational justification for it.

Comment: Re:Tigerdirect is the victim here (Score 1) 109

What was odd about the Fry's case was that many of the companies that got that business were actually lower-cost suppliers, like ECS. Right after that case broke, Frys stopped doing the really good CPU/Motherboard deals. So customers actually ended up worse off when they caught the guy.

Comment: Re:Lousy ideas (Score 1) 1013

by LehiNephi (#42347689) Attached to: Using Technology To Make Guns Safer
Speaking of which, automatic firearms are already banned, unless you go through a rigorous screening process. Nearly all handguns today, and many rifles, are semi-automatic (one trigger pull per shot). It's "semi" because although the gun automatically loads the next round, it will not automatically fire that next round.

Comment: Re:Lousy ideas (Score 3, Informative) 1013

by LehiNephi (#42347643) Attached to: Using Technology To Make Guns Safer
It's fairly well understood that the sound of racking (that's the proper term, I believe) a shotgun actually will not scare away an intruder. I wish it did--I'd much rather have the bad guy run away than have to shoot him.
Secondly, if you want a larger spread, you don't get a larger barrel--it's 12gauge (or 40, or whatever) all the way down. You can get barrels with different chokes, which constrict the opening at the end of the barrel to various degrees.

Comment: Re:Private enterprise... (Score 3, Insightful) 164

by LehiNephi (#42205639) Attached to: A Twisted Clean-Tech Tale: How A123 Wound Up In Bankruptcy
The problem is that it wasn't exactly a private free enterprise. They received a $17.1m loan guarantee from the federal government, without which their plant would not have been built. Investors saw them as a bad risk, and appropriately declined to invest in them.

Comment: Re:Just another cautionary tale (Score 3, Informative) 164

by LehiNephi (#42205575) Attached to: A Twisted Clean-Tech Tale: How A123 Wound Up In Bankruptcy
For perspective, the tax breaks given to oil companies amounts to about $2.4 billion/year (in the form tax breaks which are similar to the same tax breaks that every other industry gets for investing in expansion). Loan guarantees like the one A123 got totalled $90 billion in the "stimulus" bill passed in 2009.

Government sticking its thumb on the scales of the economy is always a bad idea--whether it be bailing out banks or perpetual ethanol subsidies + ethanol mandates + import tariffs.

Comment: Re:This isn't a bad thing. (Score 0, Offtopic) 567

by LehiNephi (#42145923) Attached to: US Birthrate Plummets To Record Low
I'm afraid the data doesn't match up with your perceptions. The rich already pay a higher effective tax rate than those in lower income brackets on average (about 24%), while the bottom 50% pay an average of less than 2%. Yes, by all means, let's let the wealthy pay their proportionate share of taxes, by reducing their tax rates!

Comment: Re:If you are young(ish), save for yourself (Score 1) 567

by LehiNephi (#42145851) Attached to: US Birthrate Plummets To Record Low
The current projections are for the Social Security Trust Fund to be depleted around 2037, last I checked. At that point, assuming the government only pays out what it brings in, benefits will be reduced by about 25%. I would assume with current demographics, the payroll taxes will pay for an ever-shrinking percentage of the original benefits, until the baby boomers die off in significant numbers.

I don't know anybody under the age of 55 who is planning on receiving benefits from SS when they retire.

Comment: Re:Calm before the hyperbole (Score 5, Insightful) 566

by LehiNephi (#41499965) Attached to: A Suicide Goes Viral On the Internet
Good point. It also sounds like at least some of the folks at Fox were trying to prevent the footage from going live, and they apologized immediately afterward. Buzzfeed, on the other hand, deliberately posted the footage with full knowledge of its contents.

I think Fox has the moral (relative) high ground here.

Comment: Anyone else have trouble parsing the title (Score 5, Insightful) 111

by LehiNephi (#41249677) Attached to: Cash-Poor Sharp Mortgages Display Factories
If the title of this post isn't reason enough to reform the English language, I don't know what is. At first I though it had something to do with homeowners refinancing.

Cash-Poor (adj) Sharp (adj/noun) Mortgages (verb/noun) Display (verb/adj/noun) Factories (noun)

Nothing is rich but the inexhaustible wealth of nature. She shows us only surfaces, but she is a million fathoms deep. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson