Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Read one, write other (Score 1) 567

by Larryish (#48578995) Attached to: The Case For Flipping Your Monitor From Landscape to Portrait


Quite a few people still use 8 or 10 year old machines, single-core or slow dual-core with a few gigs of memory, smallish harddrive, and still running Windows XP.

When a machine from 2006 can comfortably play videos on Facebook, who _needs_ to upgrade?

No one.

The fastest machines I have in the home office are dual core, 4 gigs memory, 250 or 500 gig disk running Windows 7 and Xubuntu respectively. They both perform very well.

The oldest machine is a Dell laptop from 2002 with Windows XP for use as a print server. It is slow but functional. Was using Xubuntu which was much faster but my scanner didn't like Linux.

tldr; Unless you are into new games, you really don't need a new computer.

Have you ever noticed that the people who are always trying to tell you `there's a time for work and a time for play' never find the time for play?