Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Whatever happened to transparency? (Score 1) 77

by Lakitu (#40196967) Attached to: Whose Cameras Are Watching New York Roads?

You shouldn't get all worked up about Obama being "flexible" after the elections. The Russians are upset about the missile shield (not really, they're just using it as leverage as a bargaining chip) and are trying to pressure the USA about it. Obama deflected this by saying "I agree, but these crazy republicans! I need their votes! It will be different after I get their votes."

ie, he was using the Republicans pressuring him as leverage to pressure the Russians. He's not actually flexible on the idea, and if he were, he wouldn't tell the Russians he was.

welcome to fucking politics 101.

Comment: Re:Not a good place to be (Score 5, Informative) 441

by Lakitu (#38344778) Attached to: North Korea Threatens South Korea Over Christmas Lights

The Korean war was certainly on a smaller scale than WW2, but it wasn't just a drop in the bucket. The North and its supplemental Chinese used all kinds of human wave tactics, literally just marching people off to their death and hoping that it would eventually overcome the other side. The UN and US forces were still in the WW2 era of technology -- there were almost 40,000 US deaths, compared to the almost 60,000 US deaths in Vietnam despite lasting for only three years. As an ideological, civil war, there were mass slaughters of the native Korean soldiers and civilians on both sides, with thousands being killed at a time. The bare minimum for civilian deaths is something like 2 million, and upwards of 3 million.

This doesn't include the aftermath, when the country was severed in two and completely impoverished on both sides. South Korea has some glitz and glamour today, but it centers in a few cities, and there are still millions of people living in complete poverty. North Korea is like the post-Roman Dark Ages, except for the complete dictatorship that rules over the population armed with modern weapons. Today the population is much higher than in the 1950s, with one-third or one-fourth of the population of the USA living on a peninsula that's about half the size of California. Almost 1/3 the population of the South, about 20 million people, lives in the greater Seoul area, which is basically inside artillery range which could level huge sections of the city, and the people living there, in a very short amount of time.

Nobody really knows what the North Koreans would do in a war, either. Many of them could fight to the bitter end regardless of what was actually going on. Some of them might believe the propaganda about the South and US being ruthless killers ready to slaughter them all and commit suicide like Japanese civilians and soldiers did even in the waning days of war in the Pacific in WW2. They might try to take as many people with them into death. Even in a quick war where the majority of North Korean soldiers surrendered, the leadership probably would not and would find all of the hardliners they could willing to fight.

Even in the best case scenarios of a short, one-sided war, it would be a total bloodbath. North Koreans wishing to escape the fighting or just wishing to escape the area would pour over the borders both North and South, flooding into areas not able to support that many people so suddenly. There's even a potential of the Chinese invading along the north in order to capture territory, to prevent such a huge refugee crisis, and to guarantee the continued existence of a buffer zone not dominated by American interests so close to their territory. It would be an absolute humanitarian disaster no matter the outcome and would almost certainly be accompanied by millions of deaths even in the best-case scenarios.

Comment: Re:odd all around (Score 5, Informative) 441

by Lakitu (#38344032) Attached to: North Korea Threatens South Korea Over Christmas Lights

it absolutely is, and it's ridiculous for people to think otherwise or argue about, or that it's somehow not government sanctioned. Same goes for the gigantic flags that are on display on either side of the border. The North Koreans are obsessive about not being shown up by the "imperialists", and have even showfully walked out of meetings in the DMZ because there was a disparity in the size of flags, or their soldiers were not tall enough, or there was some other very arbitrary breach of protocol. Only to come back with taller soldiers, bigger flags, and more attitude.

Of course, it takes two to tango, and the Americans and ROK Koreans are more than happy to play the game of flag waving, most notably in what ended up as Operation Paul Bunyan, when the simple desire to clear some trees from blocking a Southern outpost ended up with a group of North Koreans starting an axe-fight in the DMZ and killing an American. None of the Americans or ROK wanted to go to war over the death of one soldier, but goddamn were they were going to finish cutting down that goddamn tree, so the natural response was to launch what was at the time the largest military operation since D-Day. Aircraft carrier groups were brought in range and on standby, B-52s were in the air, helicopters were waiting in the air just beyond the hills all in support of a couple of trucks of Koreans and Americans and their chainsaw. There's a first-hand report linked to in the references section on wikipedia from this describing how weapons were smuggled in the back of the trucks and, in an attempt to provide cover while minimizing the potential for gunfire, some of the Koreans had strapped claymore land mines to their chests and stood on the bridge taunting and screaming like lunatics while the whole tree, and not just the offending branches, was cut down. All this for a damn tree branch!

The trees in this article, while much less dramatic, are no different. It even says as much and doesn't just hint at it -- they are not actually trees but 30 meters-tall metal structures in the general conical shape of a tree, built on top of a hill just 3 km from the DMZ. It's tall enough, on top of a hill enough, and bright enough to be visible across the border from a city which cannot be supplied with electricity all the time, and in a lull of the posturing about a decade ago, it was barred from being lit. How could that be anything but psychological warfare or propaganda?

That doesn't make it bad, either. It's part of a propaganda war which is continually exacerbated by the North. They don't have much to bring to the negotiating table, so they create it with these kinds of complaints, which are numerous and ridiculous, hoping to bargain it away for the crops they've stolen from their people and destroyed through terrible central management. Sometimes it's pretty meaningless, sometimes it involves the sinking of a ROK ship or shelling of a Southern island. Sometimes they have to complain about nothing just so that they don't lose face and look like they are too scared to complain. Often enough they can't even accept a good deal because they've painted themselves into a corner and always need to demand more or need to appear to be stronger or in better shape than they already appear.

Comment: Re:Annoying Valley Girl echoes (Score 1) 331

by Lakitu (#38329668) Attached to: 'Vocal Fry' Creeping Into US Speech

I think your outrage on this is mostly unfounded. If you had to drive from NYC to New Jersey, would you be upset about being told to take Holland Tunnel?

how about being told to take the Holland tunnel?

how about being told to take the tunnel?

would you get similarly upset if someone were to remove the actual object description from, say, the Tappan Zee Bridge, by referring to it only as "the Tappan Zee"?

Comment: Re:Take some of the big names already. (Score 1) 215

by Lakitu (#38261812) Attached to: Feds Seize Korean Movie Download Portals

He was agreeing with you, retard. If 5% of Americans knew what this was and were up in arms about it, it would be one of the biggest movements in American history. Since it's not one of the biggest movements in American history...

It's very easy to overlook how many people are involved in large-scale movements like this, both contemporary and historical. The overwhelming satisfaction with the outcome of the American revolution, for example, completely overshadows any doubt which actually occurred at the time. Not only were there many loyalists who wished to remain British, but there were many colonists who were sympathetic but did not wish to start or fight in a war.

If the results of the battles had turned out differently, we would all be looking back at it as if a rowdy minority had started a rebellion.

Comment: Re:First thing first (Score 1) 517

by Lakitu (#38250112) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: To Hack Or Not To Hack?

if it's so easy, I'd like to see you do it. I'd especially like to hear you ascertain the difference between "a fucking company that is in control of other people's money" and, say, the owner of, or an employee of "a fucking company ...", or, say, the home computer of one of these people, or maybe their smartphone with address books of "personal information".

The fact is "that distinction" which you think is so blaringly obvious is actually not at all obvious or easy to differentiate, so I'll be waiting a long time for your response!

thanks in advance,

System going down at 1:45 this afternoon for disk crashing.

Working...