Comment: Re:What's With All The RIM Hate? (Score 1) 214
Comment: Re:HP should buy them (Score 0) 214
>What is so great about the Blackberry email client?
Security.
Comment: Re:Dance, monkey, dance! (Score 1) 203
Comment: Re:Dance, monkey, dance! (Score 1) 203
Comment: Re:Dance, monkey, dance! (Score 1) 203
I'm not sure what I said would lead you to that conclusion. My business is successful, largely because I try to hire people smarter than I am and then get out of their way. I used to use a quote from Aristoi by Walter john Williams as a sig:"The deluded are filled with absolutes. The rest of us have to live with ambiguity."
Also, I'm sure you are aware that Dunning and Kruger were awarded an Ig Nobel for their work.
Comment: Re:Dance, monkey, dance! (Score 1) 203
Comment: Re:Dance, monkey, dance! (Score 5, Informative) 203
Demand on their time. When twenty people apply for a job, you can interview them all. When a hundred apply, you have to start examining CVs. But now, thanks to the internet, it's routine to get thousands of people apply for one job. What is an employer to do? They need some way to streamline the evaluation process. Games are another attempt to solve this problem. Many still rely on the simplist possible method though: Grab half the pile of applications and throw them straight in the bin, because there just isn't time to read so many.
I never interview 20 people for a vacancy. I never interview more than 5, and I try to keep it to 3. It's simple to narrow down the field of applications. Our typical announcement will say something like,"Submit cover letter, completed application, resume, and three letters of reference before 3 pm Friday, June 25." Somewhere between 40-60% will fail to have all of those, and they go immediately to the reject pile. If I still have a huge pile, the next sort is made on some relevant criterion. We might have said, "College degree in Industrial Hygiene or related field preferred." If it's an entry level position, I cull out those without a degree. Then I read cover letters. Can you communicate clearly in standard, written English. Spelling errors are fatal. If you don't care enough to press F7, you don't care enough to be trusted with our work product. Now I'm down to a manageable group, which I score on a matrix. Usually there will be a clearly defined top group of 2-5, which I interview. The interview is almost all about how the person will fit into our group, because the finalists can pretty much all do the job. If not, we go back through the pole or go out again. I learned long ago that the wrong hire is hugely worse than an empty chair.
Comment: Re:Dance, monkey, dance! (Score 1) 203
>Isn't it enough that I went to college and built a solid base of good work I can point to that shows I can do the job?
That is exactly what I look for when hiring. A couple of relevant references would be nice, and depending on the position, I will give you a test when you come in for an interview.
Comment: Re:Help Me Out Here (Score 1) 532
Comment: Help Me Out Here (Score 1) 532
Comment: Re:OMG (Score 1) 541
Comment: Re:What the fuck is this shit? (Score 1) 275
- [ ] It makes a "whooosh" sound
- [ ] other people in the room pause and move on
- [ ] the guy next to me whispers the explanation in my ear
- [X ] cowboy neal writes me a letter of explanation.
Comment: Re:Disgraced Republican Candidate for Governor (Score 1) 291
Anyone who watch Meg Whitman run for governor should realize by now that she is an abject retard.
But...but... She said in her campaign that we were supposed to vote for her, because she was in business and knew how to create jobs.
Comment: Re:The slow murder of the american worker continue (Score 2) 291
Oh come on... This is HP we are talking about. They likely have 30,000 people in the packaging division responsible for the absurd amount of trash every time you buy an HP product.
The trash is actually on the hard disk. The packaging is actually much more easily got rid of.