While the wording is pretty excessive, I do not think this post deserves a flamebait mod. Only that it's not limited to gamers.

And I even count myself as one of those idiots... I'm still buying Assassin's Creed games on PS3 even though I've been burned by Ubisoft repeatedly AND there hasn't been an AC game I've truly enjoyed since AC2.

So yeah, I'm pretty dumb. I acknowledge that fact.

What I'm going to do about it, though, is hack that damn console and pirate each and every game. I'm done paying before I can evaluate the quality.

How was it the reason you bought the console? If he lent you the game without having the console, how on earth did you play it?

No new console for me then *shrugs*

On the other hand, excess heat from the gas engine could be used to raise efficiency on the compression, no?

If card A has a performance of x (which I'll define as 1) and card B a performance of x+2, wouldn't that mean it's two times better?

The article keeps saying three times better, but wouldn't the correct way to phrase that be "It's three times as good?"

Similar things with percentages. If something has 200% the value of something else, it's twice as valuable and not two times more valuable, right?

I notice similar things in German, which is my main language. Am I just a grammar Nazi (badum-tis) or does that bother you too?

I think that's exactly what the parent poster said: Without storage capabilities or the means to redistribute the energy across the world from anywhere to anywhere at any time, base load is still the most important factor. And in this, I absolutely agree.

Not that we shouldn't use wind and solar, mind you. We should just stop fantasizing about it replacing nuclear anytime soon.

Nerds build stuff nobody else thought of or with material nobody ever expected to work that way.

OR

Nerds like to build things in unusual ways for the enjoyment of succeeding at it.

What nerds don't do is spending hours building stuff they need that they could have shipped to them for little money and is plug and play. At least the intelligent nerds don't do that.

Now if these products do not satisfy, that is a completely different matter.

No, no, no... we are quibbling as much about the actual cause as we quibble about semantics... and if we can't quibble about those things, we'll quibble about the effects. And during all those shenanigans, we're playing the blame-game.

You didn't really think this was about identifying and solving a problem, did you?

It's called choosing the lesser of two evils. The Yanks know a thing or two about that ;).

Dude, seriously, you didn't even need to RTFA... the summary would have been more than adequate to answer your question...

True, the Canadian dollar is worth 0.000371$ less than the US dollar. What a significant difference that makes.

So basically, not finding items of historical value is better than finding them and destroying a bit of historically valuable surroundings?

Isn't the worth of historically relevant findings in the knowledge they provide rather than their existence? If that was the case, any dude coming up with this without totally destroying everything around the coins provides a net gain to our understanding of history. I can't help but think that would be better than never finding anything at all (which is very probable).

Also, NOW they know where to go look for another archaeological site, right?

I'd not even call this a social faux-pas. It would be that if he had texted a coworker his wish for her to please him sexually, NOT KNOWING that such a behaviour was inappropriate.

This guy merely clicked a wrong button. I mean, hell, has the judge never hit the wrong button in an elevator? Never dialed the wrong number?

This makes me very sad...

So... good times ahead, then? ;)