Slashdot

I use Visual C++ because Microsoft compilers are far superior to all GNU/hippie stuff and because I believe that developers have to eat. Linuzzz sucks.

i shaved her black pussy bald and plunged my erect white penis head against her stubbled cunt and slid a plastic pink doberman shaped penis into her anus and we both howled together as we came: GNAA!

GNAA Project: Doberman, coming soon!

shit piss fuck cunt cocksucker motherfucking tits bitches

AdvFS is comparable in features to ZFS - it has snapshotting, intelligent striping and mirroring, dynamic resizing, etc.

In short, there's no comparable production filesystem in Linux right now. There's Btrfs from Oracle, but it's in deep alpha.

friendster

xanga

geocities

tripod

etc.

and don't worry about facebook, in a few short years, it too will be a hasbeen, replaced by whatever site is the new trend

social networking sites are nothing but trends. they have the limelight for a few years, then they fade. think of them as the bell bottoms and ankle warmers and member's only jackets of the web. here today, master of everything, gone tomorrow, utterly forgotten

so how do you make money off of them?

you make money off of social networking sites by becoming extremely powerful, then seducing some tragically unhip media conglomerate to buy you for gabazillions, then you sleep all day and party all night

so congratulations murdoch, you have a place in "new media" after all: the patsy left holding the bag

For those that use this as a reason to NOT use the GPL...

What would have happened if they instead used a copy of WinNT4.0 without paying Microsoft? Microsoft would want blood, and would extract it via the BSA.

The creators of Busybox just want you to host the changes you've done to it. They wanted no money.

In other words: What would $proprietary_software_manufacturer do?

The problem that would come up with that, is reverse-engineering; the encryption methods of publicly available software would be fairly easy, given only time.

In short, to answer your question, yes, the encrypted messages, etc, would be readable.

Unless everyone would like to send their emails hashed through a uniquely keyed algorithm. I'd prefer not to have to do that.

fixed that for you

http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2008-08/release.shtml

yZour Own beer

One word: http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/pics/wildbanana.jpg

There's a reason modern bananas have been bred to be seedless.