Far too appropriate if you throw this into the wrong (or right?) Text to Speech engine, at which point Microsoft seems to be targeting the Harlequin Publishing market as they invest in "nookie readers" (Thank you computer voices).

Still subject to Privacy Policy. So yes, if you put a document of your passwords or tax return on the internet and click "Share with Anybody who has the URL", they will show it to anybody who has the URL, whether you gave that URL to them or not. However if you say "Viewable by me only", showing your MP3 on their commercial would be a violation of their Privacy Policy, which would quite properly fall back on them.

Then I shall say "Good for You". :) It's all subjective and your comprehension or lack thereof has no impact for good or bad, so your lack of upsetness simply indicates a good duck back or apathy, and either way you're avoiding being upset.

I'll hit both sides in this case.

The first consideration is that PC Gamers, who already spend a ton of money on the gaming rigs and have a lot more capability than any console's half-decade-old tech, feel now like the game manufacturer is treating them like second-class citizens. PC games that have Console-optimized content, focus on the console development over PC development, generally a perceived lack of respect for the PC gaming population. Literally to the point where, in this case, development of mods for the PC is not only effectively almost Open Source, but Bethesda isn't even making any official mods except HD packs that don't look as good as the third party ones.

It's to the point where the people who spend the most money on their hardware have the least support. Then the fact that the game is throttled to work best on what is effectively nearly ancient technology these days, their super-hardware does them little good. Try using a 1x3 surround-screen setup and you'll quickly discover that the menus and UI are sized based on the width of the screen without accounting for the height. Unusable. Skyrim could have been a beautiful experience for the high-powered gamer, but it isn't unless the gamers themselves fix it. Fixing it is often a battle against the official developers also, as official patches that fix a handful of things also break dozens of third-party fixes.

Now that it's to the point where PC gamers are feeling like they're being told "Sorry, your gaming experience can be far too much better than those peoples'. We need to give you a handicap.", we're getting less and less pleased. Here's a comparison: What would you do if Amazon.com said "We're giving out cool stuff to people who buy things from us! But... We decided not to give it to anybody who lists a book on our system. Sorry, Michael, you've got all the benefits of publishing a book, so you can't have this stuff." I would expect you to potentially feel slighted. All in all, it's human nature to not want to be considered an afterthought, unsupported, inferior market segment, etc. People buy high end PCs to have a better gaming experience than the people who spend a quarter as much on a console. They don't expect to be tossed the scraps and told to fend for themselves by the game developers just because they have better hardware.

On the other side of the coin, there are many times more users buying it for the consoles. It's just a "business decision" to make the important stuff for the bigger market. One can also consider that the "additional content" probably has a strong propensity for carrying a cost, so the highest revenue will come from the larger market segment. Money speaks, after all.

PC gamers aren't upset about the lack of voice control. We've had that forever by comparison.

What we ARE upset about is:

"...been hard at work on creating the first set of game add-ons that will be exclusive to the Xbox 360. This additional content will add new quests, locations, features, and much more to the world of Skyrim."

Sometimes I think that people like to throw around numbers because they realize how few people understand the true impact.

Let's take "Only 5%" in real terms...

That means one in twenty people are being throttled. Crit in a d20 system? You're throttled. 1,000,000 Customers? 50,000 are throttled. That's a medium rural city being throttled. AT&T's nearly hundred million customers? Potentially five million throttled customers each month.*

5% is not a lot with a small total, but can be a pretty big number when you get to the subscriber count they have.

(* I am aware of the fact that they had around 95 million subscribers in January 2011, and that not all of them will be data users. There are plenty of dumb phones still around. Feel free to cut it down to, say, twenty million smart phone users at risk of bring throttled, and you still catch a million.)

...but it's purely minimalistic contact info.

The above statement (parent), if true, is the most informative item I have read in this entire comment discussion.

People born on February 29th would have to wait a darn long time to drive or watch adult movies.