It is possible to play games that are only free software on PCs powered only by free software. There just aren't many of them. We seem to be getting closer being able to replicate that niche with Android game consoles, but we're obviously not there yet, both because most Android set top boxes available aren't sufficiently open and because of the lack of console games that are free software.
It's long been possible to run entirely free software on a PC, but the world of game consoles has been a proprietary hellscape for many years.
In recent years there's been an attempt to open it up in some very modest ways, mainly through the proliferation of Android "microconsoles" and other Android-based set top boxes.
Do you find these new developments to be a step in the right direction and are you worried as I am that they're not catching on very well?
if a tab dies, you'll still close the browser and reopen it, [...] So why bother implementing something useless, just to make some people feel better.
Not me. It's pretty much the only feature keeping me from switching to Firefox. When a tab goes haywire either by crashing or eating too much CPU, I kill the process with the task manager and the rest of the browser survives. Granted, most users probably are the way you describe, but power users do what I do. If Google wants Chrome's meteoric rise to survive, they'd better not alienate power users.
There is no ID3 tag called "original artist."
When Jimi Hendrix covered Bob Dylan's "All Along the Watchtower," the artist was Jimi Hendrix because he performed the song. The composer was Bob Dylan because he created the original.
No, the original artist is the original artist (ID3v2.2 tag TOA, ID3v2.3 tag TOPE). They may also be the composer, but that is by no means certain.
There is no "original artist" tag, AFAIK. What I'm referring to is the "artist" tag which properly should refer to whoever actually made the song. If it's a remix or a cover, the artist is whoever made the remix or the cover, not the author of the original song. The author of the original is the composer.
No, ID3v2.2 and ID3v2.3 specify that multiple artists should be separated with a / character.
I was unaware of the "/" syntax being codified by the spec. But that does beg the question why don't they just allow multiple artist tags instead of a single tag as a long string separated by an awkward character? You'd think the spec authors would come up with something less stupid than that.
No, the ID3v2.2 and ID3v2.3 specs let you select multiple genres, or even mix multiple pre-defined ones with a custom one. One thing they do fall down on is defining how to tag a song with multiple custom genres.
Why not just use the "/" separator like with artists?
It may be that the vendors don't follow the spec, but you're being very unjust in blaming the authors of a spec with you obviously haven't read.
The spec is long, poorly written, and has obviously been updated since I last read it. I may have been unaware of the "/" separator thing, but it's not exactly the best idea to begin with and you might wanna hold off on the insults until you get composer vs. artist straight. Or, you know, just avoid being a jerk in general even if you are right.
The majority of tags from legit music I've bought have been incorrect.
The most common problems are:
1. Confusing composer with artist. If the song is a remix, the artist is the remixer. The original artist is the composer.
2. Genres are fuzzy. Lots of songs fit into many genres. Picking a single genre is inaccurate at best. Sadly the id3 spec only lets us pick one, so I comma separate them out of protest. Wikipedia does this too. Look up an album, see many genres, not one.
3. The infamous "Various Artists" artist. Likewise with genres, I comma separate artists because the id3 spec doesn't let us add multiple artists. Although this is actually becoming more common with legit purchased music too.
4. Bad metadata. Even legit purchased music sometimes has errors, typos, bad punctuation, etc. It always enrages me when legally purchased music has these kinds of metadata errors.
5. Quality of downloaded music. Lossless or GTFO. This is very rare. I usually have to buy actual CDs and rip them to get that kind of quality when doing it legally.
I tried switching back last year and had issues with it. I'm the sort of person who likes to keep like 3 browser windows open, each with 20 tabs. So I'm at high risk for one tab going haywire.
I abandoned Firefox for Chrome long ago for one reason: I can kill individual tabs with runaway CPU usage without fscking the whole browser.
Mozilla's been working on adding this feature for years, but AFAIK it hasn't yet made it into a stable release: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Elect...
Once that makes it into a stable release of Firefox, I'll give it another spin.
Plus it has its own song!
Where do you get a Nexus 4 battery replaced?
I know, right? It would be so much funnier if they did pinkdot again. That. Was. Awesome.
You can if the BRD lacks DRM.
Rip them with decrypter like AnyDVD into BD50 1:1 disk images to strip the DRM, then you can play them with VLC.
This release also comes with massively improved support for blu ray menus! (It existed before, but didn't work very well.)
This is exciting to me because it makes full support for (unencrypted) blu ray disk playback including blu ray menus finally possible on Linux and OS X. No more transcoding required!
It will also free Windows users from having to use all those terrible proprietary blu ray players.
This is a terrific release!