Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:99.8% of all mobile malware is on platforms (Score 1) 177

by Kethinov (#48395559) Attached to: Android 5.0 'Lollipop' vs. iOS 8: More Similar Than Ever

Malware on Android exists for the following reasons:

First and biggest reason: it has a massive market share. If iOS had Android's market share, you better believe it'd have more malware.

Second biggest reason: Google kinda sucks at curating their app store compared to iOS. This has nothing to do with sideloading. They let far too much malware into the Google Play store thanks to their policy of reporting bad apps rather than actively prescreening apps as rigorously as Apple does. Google really needs to get better at this.

Distant third: OS vulnerabilities. iOS suffers from this too occasionally.

Very distant fourth: sideloading. Way less than 1% of Android users ever enable sideloading. This is not where the majority of Android users are getting their malware. It's by far the least significant attack vector.

As such, I think it's pretty obvious that Apple adding an "enable sideloading" checkbox on iOS would not be a malware disaster anymore than it is on Mac OS X.

Comment: Re:If that matters to you then don't buy an iDevic (Score 0) 177

by Kethinov (#48389881) Attached to: Android 5.0 'Lollipop' vs. iOS 8: More Similar Than Ever

That's a false dichotomy. One platform can provide both. Android does that today.

By default Android is a walled garden and locked to Google Play just as iOS is locked to the App Store. You have to flip a well-buried switch in Android to turn that off.

On iOS there is no such choice. OS X does, but not iOS. It's totally arbitrary and unnecessary.

Comment: Terminology (Score 1) 91

by Kethinov (#48332143) Attached to: Revolutionary New View of Baby Planets Forming Around a Star

I really wish news articles would get their terminology right.

Welcome to HL Tauri - a star system that is just being born

In short, this is the mother of all embryonic star system ultrasounds.

No.

The correct term is planetary system.

But hey, at least they didn't do what so many other publications do and incorrectly refer to exoplanetary systems as "other solar systems" as though "Solar" is a generic term and not, in actuality, a proper noun referring to our sun, Sol.

Okay I'll stop being pedantic now.

But seriously, people, use the terms correctly.

Comment: The iOSification continues! (Score 5, Interesting) 355

by Kethinov (#48161435) Attached to: Apple Announces iPad Air 2, iPad mini 3, OS X Yosemite and More

For those of you who are a fan of customizing the colors of message bubbles in Messages.app and don't like that Apple removed this ability as part of the iOSification of Yosemite, there's an app for that: https://github.com/kethinov/Bu...

I made this during the developer previews because I don't like the default puke green for most of my IM conversations. Hope this helps some people. Source code also available.

+ - Reddit Forces Remote Workers To Live In San Francisco Or Lose Job->

Submitted by Kethinov
Kethinov (636034) writes "Having just raised $50 million, reddit suddenly decided to force all its remote workers to move to San Francisco. From the article: "Company CEO Yishan Wong took to Twitter to confirm the new employee policy, which he said was unrelated to the new investment. 'Intention is to get whole team under one roof for optimal teamwork. Our goal is to retain 100 percent of the team,' he said." The decision was not well received by everyone, with some suggesting that perhaps Yishan should get with the 21st century instead."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Successor to Agile/Scrum (Score 1) 101

by Kethinov (#47958617) Attached to: 'Reactive' Development Turns 2.0

It's a bit of a circular argument to say that sprint planning meetings exist because product owners don't have time to frequently reassess priority on their own. Before Scrum really took off, I recall product owners having no trouble finding the time to own the issue tracker in this manner on a regular or even daily basis.

It seems to me everyone would have significantly more time for such things if there was less process in the way like unnecessarily verbose scrum meetings which can be replaced by less invasive forms of communication.

Comment: When will it support killing CPU-hogging tabs? (Score 5, Insightful) 90

by Kethinov (#47787167) Attached to: Mozilla To Support Public Key Pinning In Firefox 32

When will Firefox support killing CPU-hogging tabs individually?

That's the only killer feature from Chrome I'm waiting for to switch back to Firefox.

In Chrome, if I've got 50 tabs open (not uncommon) and one of them starts spiking my CPU, I can pull open Activity Monitor (on OS X) and kill the "Google Chrome Helper" that's eating all the CPU.

That kills the one tab that was the problem, not the whole browser. And lets me reload it when I actually care about that tab again.

I haven't found a similar way to imitate this workflow in Firefox.

The whole noscript / flashblock / adblock / etc approach hasn't worked. Tried it with Firefox, still had constant CPU issues after whitelisting sites I need JS or Flash turned on for, still had no way to kill runaway processes individually.

The reason why worry kills more people than work is that more people worry than work.

Working...