Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: Re: Google (Score 1) 265 265

I doubt there is any filter anywhere that won't have an occasional false positive. I have had a couple. Also occasionally a spam will sneak through. That said, I use a catch-all on my domain so I get a huge amount of spam. I'm continuously impressed that it picks out my mere dozens of legit emails from the 5-10 thousand spams I get every month.

I have run my own mail server in the past. I doubt I could do any better.

Comment: Re:Perhaps this is a good thing? (Score 1) 113 113

Absolutely right. I use strong crypto routinely because I can, not because I really have anything to hide.

I would be happy if they waste time and CPU cycles on me. That in itself will help others. And if everybody did what I do, I don't think they could afford the cost of keeping up, though I'm sure that would not stop them from trying.

Comment: Re:average joe shmoe doesn't matter (Score 1) 113 113

Further to this.....and not to minimize mass surveillance which I find repugnant.....for most people the countermeasures required to protect themselves from spying is just too inconvenient to make it worthwhile. Most people really don't have anything that important to hide. It will be a plus if developers make it easier for everyone to protect themselves going forward.

But what matters now is that the small percentage of people who really do need to keep secrets from government are now taking measures to do so. If that is the effect of Snowden's revelations then it has been worthwhile, but the metrics in the article will never show that. It's not like those people are going to tell you they have changed their behavior.

Government thinks that you should be able to keep secrets from anybody but them, but history shows it is the government people most need to be able to keep secrets from. It's good that people fully know what they are up against.

And for those who say "but what about the scary terrorists!?" - I say I would rather live in a free country with a risk of terrorism than an ostensibly "safe" police state.

I'm not American, but Benny had it right; "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Ben Franklin.

Comment: Re:Meh (Score 0) 372 372

Change has always happened and money has always been spent dealing with it. It's not like we are starting from zero and OMG change is suddenly happening. You'd think the world was static before the 70s.......

Yes, it is warming. It's been warming for most of the historic record (short as that is http://woodfortrees.org/plot/h... ) . It is an interglacial so I'd bet on a long term warming trend too.

+ 0.02 ± 0.10 "records" just make it look desperate though. Sorry if I would never bet any actual money on any of their models.

Comment: Re:It's about the PR, not the Hacking (Score 2) 270 270

He's never really tested any of his theories on real equipment

That you know of. Looks like they don't want him testing anything in the real world or not..

Never worked for Boeing, Airbus or any avionics manufacturer.

They appear to not want anyone looking for vulnerabilities in their systems either.

Has never demonstrated any successful attack

I'm guessing the first person who does will not do so in a friendly way. And everyone will pretend to be surprised.

Comment: In other news.... (Score 3, Informative) 143 143

An Australian-led analysis of satellite data has found the amount of carbon sequestered in plants has risen by almost four billion tonnes since 2003, reflecting a surge in the biomass of global flora — possibly the first such increase since the Industrial Revolution..........

http://www.weeklytimesnow.com....

No skis take rocks like rental skis!

Working...