And again, evidence the article is correct... You don't know shit. Shit isn't the problem. The pathogens in the shit are the problem. Shit doesn't give you cholorea, the pathogens do.

The UN can't agree on mass murdering dictatorships, Why would they all of a sudden be on the same page wrt the internet?

Oddly enough, this is an argument in favour of UN control. Contrary to what some business interests claim, the internet works perfecly fine and doesn't need any intervention by any state to improve the way it works.

So, if the control over the internet is transfered to the UN, and if the UN essentially stalemates any proposed change to the internet, then we are all in a much better position than we are right now, because it protects the internet at a communication medium which actually works and actually benefits the people, instead of a hand full of corporations.

Here: How electronic smell detection works

Consumer protection in general is far, far better in Europe than the US.

As with many other areas, we've decided not to support restrictions on people who are trying to fuck us because, damn it, one day we might get to be the ones doing the fucking.

Or, if you prefer, in the US maintaining the purity of abstract ideology wins over demonstrable real-world benefits just about 100% of the time.

See also: health care, mandatory vacation, sick days, and maternity leave, labeling laws, etc., etc.

Plants need CO2 to live. CO2 + H2O + Sunlight == glucose. Your CO2 is waste to you. It's mana from heaven for plants. Global warmers are some of the most scientifically and agriculturally illiterate people I've ever encountered... as TFA states. Thank you AC (and mods stupid enough to mod this up) for proving the point of the article.