Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Why not? (Score 2) 689 689

The fact that it is a "religious" procedure is exactly what's being ridiculed in this post, but oh well.

And it is NOT medically beneficial. The only thing that was long established were the claims of it being beneficial, once actual scientific studies were done they overwhelmingly showed that it was completely without effect (except for the risk of complications coming from the procedure.

Comment Re:Of course... (Score 1) 413 413

Personally, I would have preferred Diane Wood as well. Kagan is too anti-civil rights and too pro-corporate for my taste.

But how a single episode of temporary nerves is supposed to indicate an incompetence to ask pertinent questions, I don't get.
I imagine rising to the position of Dean of Harvward Law School is one hellishly competitive endeavor that would require the amounts of assertiveness and competence a SCTOUS nominee should have.

I'm willing to discuss (and conceivably concede) the judge vs. lawyer point though: What exactly is it that a judge has to be able to do that a good lawyer/law professor doesn't?

Comment Re:Of course... (Score 2, Insightful) 413 413

This is of course not really worth replying to, but I'm feeling masochistic today, so:

- Kagan is the current Solicitor General of The US
- Kagan was the Dean of Law at Harvard

--> Now imagine having that on your CV and people telling you "Nah, that's not enough experience for us, sorry."

Comment Re:!newsfornerds (Score 4, Insightful) 413 413

Really? You think we're unaware of the American-heavy story selection around here?

The point here is clearly that a purely political story is misplaced on /.

That said, I would love for somebody to analyse Kagan's positions on tech issues here (or provide some pointers to places doing that).

First Person Shooters (Games)

Code Review of Doom For the iPhone 161 161

Developer Fabien Sanglard has written a code review for id Software's iPhone port of Doom. It's an interesting look into how the original 1993 game (which he also reviewed to understand its rendering process) was adapted to a modern platform. "Just like Wolfenstein 3D, Doom was rendering a screenframe pixel per pixel. The only way to do this on iPhone with an acceptable framerate would be to use CoreSurface/CoreSurface.h framework. But it is unfortunately restricted and using it would prevent distribution on the AppStore. The only solution is to use OpenGL, but this comes with a few challenges: Doom was faking 3D with a 2D map. OpenGL needs real 3D vertices. More than 3D vertices, OpenGL needs data to be sent as triangles (among other things because they are easy to rasterize). But Doom sectors were made of arbitrary forms. Doom 1993's perspective was also faked, it was actually closer to an orthogonal projection than a perspective projection. Doom was using VGA palette indexing to perform special effect (red for damage, silver for invulnerable...)."

Comment Guenter is an attention whore (Score 5, Interesting) 374 374

As spiegel.de, where I first read about Guenter Verheugens plans, says: "It's a nice idea, but 7 years too late, and your doing it for publicity only!" This commissions' term is nearly over (or at least close enough to being over for this plan to not have a rat's asses chance of being implemented while Guenter is still in office). Thus I can only agree with spiegel's assessment: Verheugen wants to go out with something attentiongrabbing (hereby accomplished) and those plans will be put back into a drawer once he leaves office.

Radioactive cats have 18 half-lives.