Too bad china is doing the same thing, you alarmist pig.
Or don't tax it and just make coal companies liable for a 2 to 1 capture program.
Once CO2 gets down to 280ppm, they can go to 1 to 1
Based on the read, their premise seems really stupid.
Reducing emissions, and getting rid of CO2 in the air are two different things. No wonder it failed.
Why won't a 10MW solar furnace near a data center not work?
If you want to reply 'doesn't work at night' you should be ashamed of yourself for commenting on something you know nothing about.
well then,it' settled.
Oh, but the numbers show they are wrong.
Anyway they only showed one thing: That in a pure capitalist society, nothing will change.
Yes, we can, in fact, replace coal with renewable energy, yes it might be marginally more expensive in the short term.
You don't really understand how taxes and tax write offs work, do you?
BF is more the Electronics. It's older then PC's for crying out loud.
And the oldest using dining cards on dates? really?
So what? They are giving money to help fund the finding for a cure of a disease. Why isn't that good enough? Would you rather nothing was given?
Is you life so disappointing to you that you need to attack groups that are trying to do some good?
I disagree. Jobs did a lot and didn't take credit.
Apple is, and has been, the greenest computer company on the planet. They just didn't advertise it until the green peace terrorist started lying about it. Apple, under Jobs, did many good things, they just didn't use it as PR. They used the user experience as PR.
Yes, there are a lot of issues with Apple.
Jobs was a hippie.
Jobs was good at dropping losers.
Sunk cost fallacy isn't something Jobs was a victim of. Did work like we thought? drop it, move on.
He was also an expert at getting people to do more then they thought they could.
"Writer and professor of philosophy "
well, I'm sure there will be some solid fact based opinion there. One that won't be applied a tiny area to a wider and different sciences.
Philosophy as a field of study in and of itself is dead. Its 'no better then astrology and rides on the coat tails of it's own history.
As an example. well, this story.
"Women are not paid less if they are doing the same jobs and spending the same time doing them as men do, "
I assume the rest of your post is based on that false data and did infect my mind with your stupidity be reading it.
Let be guess:
You incorrectly call it socialist. You assume gathering data that show something you don't like is 'whats wrong with America' and you make ad hom attacks against the article and author
Did I get that about right?
A) You can't seem to do math.
B) Female Vets do work the same hours
C) Female vets general spend more time with the pet owners then men.
"t 4-5 female vets do the job of one male vet."
this just keep driving me up a wal. So by your "logic" a female vet works 3 hours a day?
It's a lot better compared to then.
Fuck, you're stupid.
"Amazon should be free to hire who them like"
Yes, lets bring back etrenched racism, thing went so well
"and now lost again back to communist-socialism"
I see you are an idiot.
"Also flash news, weman[sic] do not prefer hard physical work all that much you know. "
Except that's not true at all.
Women make over 6000 dollars less for the same job. 11,000 is they have one child.
You idiots keep bringing up the well debunking or misleading points. Maybe you should shut the fuck up and read up on the issue?