Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
What's the story with these ads on Slashdot? Check out our new blog post to find out. ×

Comment Re:How is this legal? (Score 1) 309

How is this legal? Tricking people into paying for accounts by convincing them that someone is trying to message them would be fraud, wouldn't it?

Apparently nobody noticed.

If everybody is happy and nobody's being short-changed then it's not fraud in my book.

Comment Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid (Score 1) 211

no link because code in it actually looks like ass and is hard to read

Agree. Modifying the 'i' look like an 'l' was a neat trick. I would never have thought of doing that.

Still, it looks like it was designed for people who think white-on-black is a good color scheme for text. You can't expect too much.

PS: And how would "low contrast" be seen as a good thing? Beats me.

Comment Re: When The Lunatics Take Over The Asylum (Score 2) 456

I think what is missing from most parents is the follow through

This.

I hear constant streams of "if you don't do XXXX then I'm going to YYYY" from parents but they never actually seem to do it. If they actually do try to follow up the kid will scream for 0.0005 seconds and the parent instantly gets all apologetic.

Don't be afraid to let kids scream a couple of times. Totally ignore them when they do it. They'll soon figure out it doesn't work.

Pet hate #2 is parents who constantly ask kids what they want to do today, what they want to eat, or whatever. You don't ask kids what they want, you tell them. You put whatever it is everybody else is eating on a plate in front of them and tell them to eat it. If they don't eat it, they go hungry.

Be the boss.

Comment Re:What does Science have to say about this? (Score 1) 588

It's exactly what double blind means. You don't tell the subjects whether they're in the active, placebo, or control groups.

Nope, that's a blind test.

Double-blind means the people handing out the pills also don't know if they're placebo or not. This eliminates any subtle body-language vibes they might be giving out to the people who swallow them.

Comment Re:Upstart? Scarebus? Comparison to Concorde? (Score 1) 345

Dear sir, I was replying to a person who wrote - and this is a direct quote form his post:

"One of the major reasons the Concord didn't do very well was that the USA banned it from their airports out of jealousy before it had even flown."

That is either a known lie, or really bad repetition of a falsehood, a statement not built on facts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

It says something about "Scheduled flights began on 21 January 1976 ... the US Congress had just banned Concorde landings in the US".

Comment Re:Upstart? Scarebus? Comparison to Concorde? (Score 1) 345

Well...
Concorde: Mach 2.02
F-14 Tomcat: Mach 2.34
F-15 Eagle: Mach 2.50
F-16 Falcon: Mach 2.05

The *only* way a Concorde could outrun either of these is if said Concorde had at least a 100-200 mile head start when the chase began, which was likely the case.

Nah. None of those could achieve those speeds without afterburner which used up their fuel in about 15 minutes. Concord could cruise at that speed for hours.

If it wasn't for Newton, we wouldn't have to eat bruised apples.

Working...