Wow. Just wow.
Walk with blinders much? Do you even pay attention to the conversations of which you participate?
It was claimed:
"Now look at the list of terror attacks in 2012"
To which you responded with several citations to counter the original posters position. Then you summarized with the following:
"If you guess every terrorism attack in the USA is Islamic, you're going to be wrong more often than you are right."
I pointed out both the inaccuracies of your source AND how you misinterpreted the data. I suggested you look at the entire "alleged" section to see just how many were in fact Islamic based (which would make him right more often than wrong).
Your response was to ignore your failure to make your point and suggest I go "fix" your source material. Again, that's not my job. You made a claim and backed it up with faulty information. You need to either let your argument die or come up with better source material. Please note I'm ignoring the back-handed insult fashion in which you presented your "suggestion" to fix the wiki. Real classy by the way.
You want to suggest my 'priority is winning pissing contests rather than the truth'? Really? You are ignoring the 'truth' that your position has no foundation -- and in fact, the inverse is strongly suggestive of being accurate using your OWN sources (if one actually takes the time to interpret the data presented). What a pretentious prat.
I'll keep "pissing" with my eyes open, you keep walking down the street with blinders on spitting at anyone who tells you to look left, right or tries to warn you not to step in your own filth.