Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Government

House Appropriators May Limit Public Availability of Pending Bills 184

Posted by samzenpus
from the no-bill-for-you dept.
Attila Dimedici writes "The House Appropriations Committee is considering a draft report that would forbid the Library of Congress to allow bulk downloads of bills pending before Congress. The Library of Congress currently has an online database called THOMAS (for Thomas Jefferson) that allows people to look up bills pending before Congress. The problem is that THOMAS is somewhat clunky and it is difficult to extract data from it. This draft report would forbid the Library of Congress from modernizing THOMAS until a task force reports back. I am pretty sure that the majority of people on Slashdot agree that being able to better understand how the various bills being considered by Congress interact would be good for this country."

Comment: Re:What they really meant. (Score 1) 61

by sethstorm (#40173647) Attached to: Australia Drops Second Google Investigation

It is unreasonable to expect to collect corporate income taxes from corporations that are not actually domiciled in the taxing entity. Legally speaking, it is essentially impossible. Tariffs and GSTs are about the only options.

Tax collection cooperation between countries to moot jurisdictional issues would be a way to handle it as well. For the remaining countries, there's always the military & intelligence departments of a large country, such as the US or Australia.

Cloud

IT Desktop Support To Be Wiped Out Thanks To Cloud Computing 348

Posted by samzenpus
from the who-needs-help dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Tech industry experts are saying that desktop support jobs will be declining sharply thanks to cloud computing. Why is this happening? A large majority of companies and government agencies will rely on the cloud for more than half of their IT services by 2020, according to Gartner's 2011 CIO Agenda Survey."

Comment: Re:Lips? (Score 1) 1171

by mbrod (#40153987) Attached to: Debate Over Evolution Will Soon Be History, Says Leakey
Men and women have faults, does God as well?

The quote I posted was from the Qur'an.

We see slow ongoing changes in the fossil record but there is no shortage of "flood" events. Where we see rapid change as well. Many species becoming extinct and rapid changes in others.

Evolution is one chapter in the book of life, it is not the whole story.

The logic of "Genesis didn't tell us about this" is weak. What do people expect to be told about their origins by the Creator?

Comment: Lips? (Score 1) 1171

by mbrod (#40142971) Attached to: Debate Over Evolution Will Soon Be History, Says Leakey
It's not covered by Genesis. There's no explanation for this change going back 500 million years in any book I've read from the lips of any God.

[6.6] Do they not consider how many a generation We have destroyed before them, whom We had established in the earth as We have not established you, and We sent the clouds pouring rain on them in abundance, and We made the rivers to flow beneath them, then We destroyed them on account of their faults and raised up after them another generation.

Guess he was reading the wrong books. And BTW God doesn't have lips, He is the Creator of lips.

Comment: It's a Lenovo Thinkpad/Apple decision. (Score 5, Insightful) 730

by sethstorm (#40124057) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: How To Shop For a Laptop?

Select between Lenovo(Thinkpad) and Apple refurbished, then drill down to whatever models fit the criteria. Then do a favor for them and get them to have the longest warranty obtainable. For Lenovo, this would be 5-year(?, maximum may be 4) onsite service. For Apple, whatever Applecare does is going to have to do.

Either company has some thin and stylish laptops in that price range. Lenovo just happens to make them more maintenance friendly.

Comment: Re:Dallas Mavericks Owner (Score 1) 215

by Shihar (#40118071) Attached to: Dark Days Ahead For Facebook and Google?

Most of which are noble experiments but money sinks, and don't last very long. Of the ones that are successful, virtually all are just a means of selling more ads.

Except for that... you know... that whole Android thing. You can drop a couple million here and there on dead end projects if one occasionally turns around and suddenly becomes the largest OS on the fast growing type of device (mobile). Google sucked the air out of the room for anyone doing maps, e-mail, web browsing, and now mobile devices. That isn't to suggest that there are not worthy competitors in all fields, but Google is a god damn gorilla in each and makes its competitors fight tooth and nail.

Google dumps money into pie in the sky R&D. Most of the time it fails miserably as that sort of things tends to do, but when it wins, it WINS. Google is clearly thinking ahead. They saw mobile coming and got their shit together in time to claim the lions share of the market, something Microsoft and Nokia utterly failed to do despite being in a vastly superior positions to do it.

Google's history in R&D is a jerk off fantasy for anyone who does that sort of work. Mobile is an excellent example because Google wasn't just doing mobile. Google was also doing ChromeOS. Why ChromeOS? Google was doing ChromeOS because it covered its bases, didn't truly know what the "next" thing was, and so had plates spinning for everything. If netbooks had ended up being the next big thing, Google would have been ready. It turned out that the answer was mobile, and ChromeOS faded out. That doesn't make ChromeOS a failure. A failure would have to have picked netbooks over mobile and watched as mobile won. A failure would have been to pick mobile and see netbooks win. Victory is picking both, having one of those investments be a minor waste and having the other investment consume market share like it was their job (which I suppose it is).

I am sure that Google is going to slip from their throne and fall someday when technology takes one hard right turn or another. It is inevitable. Everyone fades or fails eventually. That said, I wouldn't be one to bet against Google any time soon. I for one know I would be doing a lot more browsing on the 'tubes if someone offered me up an autonomous car and then used a pile of dark fiber to line the roads with data connections...

Google

Call For DOJ To Reopen Google Wi-Fi Spying Investigation 82

Posted by timothy
from the we-were-just-in-the-neighborhood dept.
angry tapir writes "Two U.S. lawmakers have called on the U.S. Department of Justice to reopen its investigation into Google's snooping on Wi-Fi networks in 2010 after recent questions about the company's level of cooperation with federal inquiries. Representatives Frank Pallone Jr., a New Jersey Democrat, and John Barrow, a Georgia Democrat, called on the DOJ to fully investigate Google's actions for potential violations of federal wiretapping laws. In light of a recently released U.S. Federal Communications Commission report on Wi-Fi snooping by Google Street View cars, the DOJ should take a new look at the company's actions, wrote the lawmakers in a letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder."

Comment: Re:One place where the N900/N9 would shine. (Score 1) 145

Well, the screen resolution is barely adequate, the CPU struggles on many web pages, the battery life could definitely do with improvement, the operating system is a bit clumsy, the software support very poor relative to other mobile OS and the upgrade path non-existent.

On those problems:
CPU: Overclocking can fix that.
Battery: Double-size batteries do exist for the N900, extending the lifetime to a more friendly 8 hours.
Software Support: CSSU, since it does a lot better than the N770/N8x0 days where neither had it.
Upgrade path: The N9, or thank Elop for removing the possibility for future Meego models.

QOTD: "He's on the same bus, but he's sure as hell got a different ticket."

Working...