Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: It is all a moot point in so many ways (Score 1) 313

by Jenny Z (#42374191) Attached to: Coral Reefs In Grave Danger, Say Climate Simulations

"This paper presents a new formula for calculating when fossil fuel reserves are likely to be depleted and develops an econometrics model to demonstrate the relationship between fossil fuel reserves and some main variables. The new formula is modified from the Klass model and thus assumes a continuous compound rate and computes fossil fuel reserve depletion times for oil, coal and gas of approximately 35, 107 and 37 years, respectively. This means that coal reserves are available up to 2112, and will be the only fossil fuel remaining after 2042." http://www.peakoil.net/publications/when-will-fossil-fuel-reserves-be-diminished

    Current trends cannot be continued until 2100. There isn't enough fossil fuel. All the easily reachable oil is going to be burned and go into the atmosphere, no matter how successful the attempts to curb global warming. If we dramatically curb the use of fossil fuels, it will simply take a little longer to burn it all up. But it is all going into the atmosphere. There is no political force strong enough to tell all the people of the world they can't run their cars or heat their homes with fossil fuels any more. Since is entirely futile to stop all the easily extracted fossil fuel from being burned, there is no point in debating how to curb emissions. Our focus should be on what we can do to minimize the impact.

 

Comment: Wow, for only $100/yr I can get free UPDATES? (Score 5, Insightful) 349

by Jenny Z (#41381433) Attached to: MS Office 2013 Pushing Home Users Toward Subscriptions

It is kind of funny how the marketing departments of big software companies think we actually look forward to 'updates' which annoy us and waste our time. Now I actually breath a sigh of relief when my BlueRay player gets past the moment where it may insist I have to spend 5 minutes 'updating' before I can watch my movie. I can't imagine wanting to pay $100 in return for being hassled with updates I don't care about. Apparently, they haven't figured out that people very well might pay $100 to never be bothered with them.

Comment: Re:hmm (Score 1) 146

by Jenny Z (#38417158) Attached to: Philosopher Patrick Lin On the Ethics of Military Robotics

Who is responsible for the AI's actions? Is it the machine? Is it the person who setup and turned on the machine, or the person who designed the machine?

        As far as the law goes, isn't it important that the accused understand their own actions? I.E. the insanity defense allows you to prevent taking responsibility for your actions. So if the machine does not understand anything, then how can it be held responsible?

      By this test, the responsibility for the non-self aware machine's actions should lie with the person who sets up and actives it. They should understand what the machine may do when they set it loose, autonomous or not.

      Then the comes question, what does it really mean to 'understand' something? I don't think anybody yet has a good answer for that, but no machine I've heard of seems to actually understand anything yet. I think this has been a big problem in the pursuit of the self-aware machine. Nobody understands understanding yet, so how can they build a machine which does it?

      In the article, they mention how robots are immune to fatigue or emotion etc, but I think that may not necessarily be the case with a self-aware AI. Are we so sure that you can make a self-aware machine without emotion or feeling? Isn't it ultimately a balance of conflicting emotion that drives us? How can you *want* to do something if you do not have any feeling? And if you don't *care* about anything, then there is no reason to any action over any other. An intelligence that does not care about anything may just as likely commit suicide or sit like a lump rather than something useful to itself or us.

    I think the truly intelligent machine is coming, but I don't think it operate at all like a drone with logic. When you get a machine which is self-aware you not only have ethical issues about what the machine does to humans, but also about what humans do to the machine. That may sound silly, but I can imagine that a self-aware intelligent machine with feelings and memory could be very vulnerable with no ability to defend itself from its owner.

Businesses

When Smart People Make Bad Employees 491

Posted by samzenpus
from the boss's-favorite dept.
theodp writes "Writing for Forbes, CS-grad-turned-big-time-VC Ben Horowitz gives three examples of how the smartest people in a company can also be the worst employees: 1. The Heretic, who convincingly builds a case that the company is hopeless and run by a bunch of morons; 2. The Flake, who is brilliant but totally unreliable; 3. The Jerk, who is so belligerent in his communication style that people just stop talking when he is in the room. So, can an employee who fits one of these poisonous descriptions, but nonetheless can make a massive positive contribution to a company, ever be tolerated? Quoting John Madden's take on Terrell Owens, Horowitz gives a cautious yes: 'If you hold the bus for everyone on the team, then you'll be so late that you'll miss the game, so you can't do that. The bus must leave on time. However, sometimes you'll have a player that's so good that you hold the bus for him, but only him.' Ever work with a person who's so good that he/she gets his/her own set of rules? Ever been that person yourself?"
Google

Google Declines To Turn Over Harvested Wi-Fi Data 201

Posted by Soulskill
from the let's-have-this-fight-again dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Google declined to submit data collected as part of the 'Spy-Fi' flap, and Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal is now promising further action: '"I certainly will be pressing for continued involvement at the federal level in coordination with the states," Blumenthal told Politico Monday, just days after promising to explore "additional enforcement actions" if Google does not share the data soon. Asked to describe what those federal efforts might include, the outgoing attorney general said, "There's a range of potential opportunities for oversight and scrutiny by a member of the US Congress – including letters, meetings, hearings, and potentially even legislation." For its part, Google has tried to defuse the issue by offering to delete the data. The company reaffirmed that position in a Friday statement, promising to work with Blumenthal in the coming weeks, but declined to comment further on Monday.'"
Games

Valve Announces Dota 2 128

Posted by Soulskill
from the new-and-improved-ways-for-people-to-call-you-terrible dept.
RulerOf writes "Just over a year after hiring IceFrog, the lead developer of the wildly popular DotA Allstars mod for Warcraft III, and the speculation surrounding Valve's recent trademark filing for the 'DotA' name, Valve has officially announced Dota 2. Gameplay of Dota 2 is being ported 'exactly' from the current DotA Allstars and includes every hero, but vast improvements are being made to the game including VoIP, a coaching system, in-game rewards, and AI that takes over for disconnected players. Lastly, it all runs on top of the Source engine. (GameInformer's website appears to be struggling right now though, as they had an exclusive on this story.)"
Image

The Real 'Stuff White People Like' 286

Posted by samzenpus
from the taking-a-closer-look dept.
Here's an interesting and funny look at 526,000 OkCupid users, divided into groups by race and gender and all the the things each groups says it likes or is interested in. While it is far from being definitive, the groupings give a glimpse of what makes each culture unique. According to the results, white men like nothing better than Tom Clancy, Van Halen, and golfing.
Image

The Push For Colbert's "Restoring Truthiness" Rally 703

Posted by samzenpus
from the giving-truth-the-bump dept.
jamie writes "A grassroots campaign has begun to get Stephen Colbert to hold a rally on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial to counter Glenn Beck's recent 'Restoring Honor' event. The would-be rally has been dubbed 'Restoring Truthiness' and was inspired by a recent post on Reddit, where a young woman wondered if the only way to point out the absurdity of the Tea Party's rally would be if Colbert mirrored it with his own Colbert Nation.'"

Comment: This sounds great, but... (Score 1) 162

by Jenny Z (#33436300) Attached to: New Silicon-Based Memory 5X Denser Than NAND Flash

Density and cost may be the holy grail, but there are a number of other properties which important which can make the difference between marketplace success or failure.

1.) Data Reliability
2.) Data Lifetime
3.) Store element lifetime - do the individual storage locations 'wear out' like flash?
3.) Read/Write Speed - Although there is an article in Science Daily which reports 100ns
4.) Power Requirement

I didn't see any of these mentioned in the article. If these properties are all equal to or superior to flash, it could be the next big thing.

Comment: Re:How about integers instead of floating point? (Score 3, Informative) 137

by Jenny Z (#31272016) Attached to: <em>Quake 3</em> For Android

You can still use integer math to represent fractional values. For example, using the upper 16 bits as the integer part, and the lower sixteen as the fractional part.

    Something like this only implemented with inline assembly:

Int32 fMult( Int32 a, Int32 b)
{
      return (Int32) (((Int64) a * (Int64) b)>>32);
}

You don't have nearly the dynamic range of floating point, but you *can* implement rotation matrices, vectors, time and distance and physics calculations. You just have to be careful to keep the values in range.

A penny saved is a penny to squander. -- Ambrose Bierce

Working...