Comment: Re:Climate scientist conspiracy? (Score 1) 1190
You argue that global warming exists, and then try to grandfather in a defense of man-made global warming by insisting that since a consensus of scientists believe that global warming exists, that it somehow magically follows that all scientists believe man causes the earth to get warmer, which is at the heart of the issue.
Yes, we can see the Earth is getting warmer, but it is evident from numerous pieces of cleverly discarded data that there is a cyclical warming period. The idea that human beings can take a billion year old chunk of rock and obliterate it by replacing lost carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is pseudoscience at best, ridiculous political theater at the worst.
All the while, climate scientists are being used as pawns by crazy environmentalists who have turned a ridiculous theory into a religion.
Yes, we can see the Earth is getting warmer, but it is evident from numerous pieces of cleverly discarded data that there is a cyclical warming period. The idea that human beings can take a billion year old chunk of rock and obliterate it by replacing lost carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is pseudoscience at best, ridiculous political theater at the worst.
All the while, climate scientists are being used as pawns by crazy environmentalists who have turned a ridiculous theory into a religion.