Comment: Re:Why still fooling with ONE camera? (Score 1) 205
And an index. What the hell, give 'em all five fingers.
Enterprises Don't Understand IT Risk->
Submitted
by
Orome1
Orome1 writes "A global survey of more than 1,240 IT decision makers at large enterprises – 72% of which have more than 1,000 employees – found that 33% of respondents do not believe their organizations have an accurate assessment of the level of IT risk they face from internal and external threats. This lack of confidence in risk assessment is warranted for two reasons. First, nearly one in four companies (23%) indicated that they do not have a formal IT risk management program in place. Second, a large percentage of businesses do not routinely review user access rights to data."
Link to Original Source
Link to Original Source
Comment: Re:Ok great for beginners (Score 1) 640
ROFL, I just spit my coffee all over my desk.
And here I thought that no one remembered that anymore.
Kudos to you, sir. Five-digit Slashdot UID megabonus included.
Comment: OK, please remember it's time travel! (Score 1) 1270
And not space travel, so unless you're already where you want to be, there's no use in being able to be when you want to be.
Especially if you're going as far back as to be in a time where long distance travel would be hard, time-consuming, or right down impossible.
If I'm nitpicking, please blame The Big Bang Theory, season 1, episode 14.
Comment: Re:No password WiFi != unsecured (Score 5, Informative) 161
Not if the communication is not encrypted and there is any traffic at the time.
Comment: Re:This Is a Comment Expressing New Found Skeptici (Score 5, Funny) 193
This is where I back your assumptions with the oblig. xkcd.
Comment: Re:It should be: 4+3+2=x+2 (Solve for x) (Score 2, Funny) 1268
oh! Whoosh for me then!
(heads on to Wikipedia)
Comment: Re:I guess I'm stupid, too. (Score 1) 1268
The way I see it, since it is a logical implication and not a condition, it would be better to use the "implies that" sign:
4+3+2=x+2 => 4+3+2-2=x => 4+3=x => 7=x
But I teach UNIX at my University, so I must be wrong.
Comment: Re:It should be: 4+3+2=x+2 (Solve for x) (Score 1) 1268
You divided by zero in step five.
Comment: Re:Time to head to home depot... (Score 1) 147
Unfortunately, I'm sure I'll be getting this in as chain letters for years to come.
What are these "letters" you talk about? Is this some new social network, or a new kind of e-mail?
(Yeah I know, off-topic, mod me down to hell, I can burn some...)