Comment: Re:And (Score 1) 240
Because you like pain.
That would be the correct answer to "Why should I want a dominatrix to spank me?", not "Why should I use PHP?".
One man's pain is another man's pastry. Especially if he's French.
|
|
Because you like pain.
That would be the correct answer to "Why should I want a dominatrix to spank me?", not "Why should I use PHP?".
One man's pain is another man's pastry. Especially if he's French.
The community is the main reason to avoid the language all together. If the other users that you turn to for help are nothing but a bunch of elitist Mac-using hopster pricks, then that's your cue to stay away from that launage at all costs.
Yeah? Why don't you write about it in your blag?
When I see people defending PHP, I have the same reaction I get when I see Scientologists defending a religion started by a science fiction author.
The only reason you'd be attacking PHP is so you can hide your own foolish design mistakes. Why don't you tell us what those are? WHAT ARE YOUR CRIMES?
Yes, it's "just as good" as Ruby, Python, or other competing problem-space solutions in a strict Turing-completeness way, but in all pragmatic senses it has been a complete and utter rolling disaster.
Godwin's Law applies just as well to programming language advocacy: If your defense of a language requires pointing out that it's Turing-complete, you lose the argument.
"(for those who don't get it: in music, generally speaking, the sharps and flats overlap. C sharp = D flat)"
Unless you're a music theorist.
And specifically an ill-tempered one.
Me too!
(2 points to whoever gets the reference)
Posting "Me too!", like some brain-dead AOL-er?
I'd argue that colour screens did give us a big, obvious, and immediate improvement - syntax highlighting.
Actually, THINK Pascal did syntax highlighting on black and white Macintosh systems. It used different styles, such as boldface, instead of colors.
And just as importantly, why does God <longpause></longpause> need a spaceship?
This has been an allusion to the worst Star Trek movie ever.
Really? I thought it was a reference to the 'Marklar' episode of South Park.
For a massive example of MAD failing, take a look at the patent lawsuits between Apple/Google/Samsung/Nokia etc.
Lawsuits don't necessarily amount to mutually assured destruction for large companies, so it's not a failure of MAD.
It's a case of iterated Prisoner's Dilemma. Usually, companies will cross-license each other's patents, since cooperating is cheaper than suing each other. But if, say, Apple believes the expected damages from an infringement suit against Google (minus the cost in PR and legal expense) outweigh the benefits of peaceful coexistence, then it makes sense (from their perspective) to sue.
Is there anywhere I can download the movie in its entirety?
YouTube? You can use Video DownloadHelper with Firefox, or one of the command-line equivalents.
Finality is death. Perfection is finality. Nothing is perfect. There are lumps in it.