Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Scary (Score 1) 73

by Jarryd98 (#37996664) Attached to: Stop Online Piracy Act Supports Blacklisting, Says EFF
Blacklisting of the highlighted example (digital) items via the internet filter was never enacted in practice, other than during selective trials - as far as I'm aware.

It's important to remember that plans to introduce national filtering were first publicly announced mid-way through Labor's past term. The policy was quietly shelved (albeit not indefinitely - Conroy became less vocal in regards to promoting the policy) during the later stages of Labor's re-election campaign.

It's still a significant threat. Labor likely realised such policy would lose them a portion of (not so insignificant) youth votes. Expect it to quietly emerge again at some point.

Comment: Re:Thats why Australia is spending $36B on the NBN (Score 1) 133

by Jarryd98 (#36539844) Attached to: Australia's 2 Largest ISP's Start Censorsing the Web

The post was intended as clarification (for those unaware) that the NBN was proposed (by the same party - Labor) well before 'clean-feed' or filtering of any form had been publicly mentioned, or suggested in Parliament.

It's debatable whether the government's original intent for the NBN was for use as a means of filtering/monitoring. I've only highlighted that any form of filtering was proposed well after the original NBN announcement (and Labor's rise to power). Not before, as suggested in your original post.

I'm not sure if you're unaware, or conveyed that message unintentionally because, at least at the beginning, it wasn't simply a case of 'hadn't worked it out.'

Comment: T&C? (Score 1) 133

by Jarryd98 (#36539562) Attached to: Australia's 2 Largest ISP's Start Censorsing the Web
Just to clarify, both ISPs have elected to be involved in the program - yet neither of which will (if I'm understanding this correctly) allow their users to opt out? Surely this is a breach of the contract terms/conditions.
Introducing mandatory filtering to customers (who, in the case of either ISP, are likely bound by 24 month contracts...) falls slightly outside the bounds of 'we reserve the right to alter terms and conditions at any time.'
This is far beyond a sick joke.

Comment: Re:Depends (Score 1) 443

by Jarryd98 (#36204178) Attached to: Why IT Needs To Change for Gen Z
Based on personal experience, the issue seems to start with executives, rather than the Generation Z underlings mentioned in the article. Usually in the following order, Executive: - Hears of new device. - Purchases said device. - Preaches (corporate) virtues of recently purchased device. - Demands device be catered for (and managed/monitored) within workplace environment, regardless of impracticality. Sound familiar? As an aside, who's to say those mentioned in the article are going to be in a position to dictate which devices are/aren't managed? After all, *they* are seeking employment.

Comment: Adhering to standards. (Score 4, Insightful) 90

by Jarryd98 (#35265586) Attached to: Australian Telco Telstra Complies With GPL
I'd have to agree with the above comments. Telstra doesn't deserve any credit for compliance alone. It's expected. Many people seem far too willing to forgive/forget within a short period of time. They delivered what was expected of them after an extended period of inaction. That is all.
Games

Cedega Being Replaced By GameTree Linux 124

Posted by Soulskill
from the what's-in-a-name dept.
An anonymous reader writes "TransGaming Cedega, the software forked from Wine that allows running Windows games under Linux, is being discontinued and replaced by GameTree Linux. This new software is also free. From the new website: 'TransGaming is pleased to announce the continued development of Cedega Technology under the GameTree Developer Program. This repositioning of the technology that powered the Cedega Gaming Service will allow the entire Linux community to gain free access going forward. Cedega is a cross-platform enablement technology that allows for Windows-native games to be executed on both the Linux desktop and embedded Linux platforms.'"
Businesses

Searching For Alternatives To China's Rare Earth Monopoly 199

Posted by Soulskill
from the do-not-pass-go-do-not-collect-200-kg-of-ytterbium dept.
KantIsDead writes "MIT's Technology Review adds to the ongoing discussion of China's monopoly on rare earth metals, an issue that was temporarily catapulted to national attention during China's rare earth embargo of Japan. The current article focuses on the search for alternatives to rare earth metals that would undercut China's monopoly and allow nations to develop their industry without fearing the hand of a Chinese embargo. From the article: 'In the US, the Chinese dominance of rare-earth mineral production has prompted a surge of funding focused on developing permanent magnets that use less, if any, rare-earth materials, such as nearly $7 million from the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Energy (ARPA-E). In one of these projects, University of Nebraska researchers are working to enhance permanent magnets made with an alloy iron and cobalt, or FeCo. This class of materials is sold today, but delivers half or less of the power of the best rare-earth-based magnets. The Nebraska researchers will focus on ways to dope the structural matrix of these alloys with traces of other elements, thereby rearranging their molecular geometry to create stronger, more durable permanent magnetic materials.'"

PLUG IT IN!!!

Working...