Comment: "Broad implications?" (Score 1) 105
Not likely to have especially broad implications. The factual question is whether the current standard of deference given to a patent should be maintained in the face of art submitted by a defendant, if that art was never considered by the patent office. Of course, 97% of patent cases never reach a jury, and relatively few of the remaining 3% turn on an invalidity analysis (as opposed to simple infringement/non-infringement).
There's a good analysis of the likely impact of any Microsoft-favoring ruling over at Patently-O.