Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Operating Systems

Recommending a secure OS to the Dalai Lama

Submitted by
Jamyang (Greg Walton)
Jamyang (Greg Walton) writes "I am editor of the Infowar Monitor and co-author of the recent report, Tracking Ghostnet. I have been asked by the Office of His Holiness, the Dalai Lama (OHHDL) and the Tibetan Government in Exile (TGIE) to offer some policy recommendations in light of the ongoing targeted malware attacks directed at the Tibetan community worldwide. Some of the recommendations are relatively straightforward. For example, I will suggest that OHHDL convene an international Board of Advisers, bringing together some of the brightest minds in computer and international security to advise the Tibetans, and that the new Tibetan university stands up a Certified Ethical Hacking course. However, one of the more controversial moves being actively debated by Tibetans on the Dharamsala IT Group [DITG] list, is a mass migration of the exile community (including the government) to Linux, particularly since all of the samples of targeted malware collected exploit vulnerabilities in Windows. I would be very interested to hear Slashdot readers opinions on this debated here. Allow me to play devil's advocate for a moment here: in the short term, moving to a platform that is perhaps less familiar to the attacker provides considerable relief, but it is essentially less difficult to write exploits for Mac OS/Linux than it is for Windows, given the many anti-exploitation mechanisms Microsoft has embedded in the last years, so in the long run, if the attackers want your data, the entire move is moot. People should choose a platform based on their productivity requirements instead of purely security. Furthermore, most of the web servers broken into during these attacks (to be used as command and control servers) were not Windows, but Linux. What do you think? (While I have the floor I'd also like to take this opportunity to plug two initiatives where Slashdot readers can directly help the Tibetan tech community, either through sharing your expertise or your cash! Firstly, one of the obstacles to migrating to Linux for a Tibetan speaker is the lack of decent Tibetan font — can you help? Secondly, Avaaz is raising funds for projects that will help End The Blackout in Tibet, including a proposal to support the deployment of Psiphon's circumvention network. Thanks, or in Tibetan, thuk.je.che!"
Security

Naomi Klein: China's All-Seeing Eye->

Submitted by
Greg Walton
Greg Walton writes "With the help of U.S. defense contractors, China is building the prototype for a high-tech police state. It is ready for export. . . Naomi Klein has written an astonishing investigative piece for Rolling Stone on China's Golden Shield project: Herrington pauses. "George W. Bush," he adds, "would do what they are doing here in a heartbeat if he could." China-bashing never fails to soothe the Western conscience — here is a large and powerful country that, when it comes to human rights and democracy, is so much worse than Bush's America. But during my time in Shenzhen, China's youngest and most modern city, I often have the feeling that I am witnessing not some rogue police state but a global middle ground, the place where more and more countries are converging. China is becoming more like us in very visible ways (Starbucks, Hooters, cellphones that are cooler than ours), and we are becoming more like China in less visible ones (torture, warrantless wiretapping, indefinite detention, though not nearly on the Chinese scale)."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Ubiquitous Sensors + Ubiquitous Networks (Score 1) 566

by Jamyang (#5083097) Attached to: RFID: The New Big Brother ?
= Ubiquitous Sensor Networks

Could we be constantly tracked through our clothes, shoes or even our cash in the future?

In order to carry out tracking on the scale that Declan suggests - of a every citizen, on a nationwide scale, - you would need to deploy a vast array of sensor networks.

DARPA has put a high priority on developing such networks in their drive to digitize the battlespace under the "Persistence over the battlefield" philosophy that dominates current military thinking.

Cebrowski sums this doctrine up:

We are seeing the emergence of sensor-based warfare. The reality is, the world knows if we can sense it, we can kill it.

- Retired Navy Vice Adm. Arthur Cebrowski,
[Office of Force Transformation, February 5, 2002]

First take: Check out DARPAs IXO - The Information Exploitation Office:
http://dtsn.darpa.mil/ixo/

in particular, Dr. Sri Kumar's Sensor Information Technology (SensIT) Program:

http://dtsn.darpa.mil/ixo/sensit.asp

. . The SensIT program will create the binding between the physical world and cyberspace. Today's information systems focus on human input or computer generated data for fodder, but the future will build on continuous streams of real-world physical data. The SensIT program is founded on the concept of a networked system of cheap, pervasive platforms that combine multiple sensor types, embedded processors, positioning ability and wireless communication. Specifically the mission of SensIT is to develop all necessary software for networked microsensors.

Incidentally, seems to me, one corollary of the Cebrowski doctrine might be, if you can't sense it . . .

http://go.openflows.org/admin.pl?op=edit&sid=03/01 /14/1033209

Ubiquitous Sensor Networks, Next 10 years:

2000: 100 million image sensors sold worldwide (Cahners In-Stat Group)

2006: 1 billion 'mobile' sensors on 21 million telematic-enabled cars in US (Telematics Research Group)

2006: 2.5 billion devices on the Internet (Dr. Vinton Cerf)

2010: 60 trillion wireless sensors deployed worldwide (Ernst & Young)

RF Micro Devices Opens Sales And Customer Support Office in China
One Billion Smart Cards

Everything can be filed under "miscellaneous".

Working...