Unfortunately, this will just get used by anti-science folks to point out how full of shit "science" is.
Or, it will be used by pro-science folks to point out how full of shit the peer "review" system is -- or can be.
Admittedly, I don't know who Bennet Hasselhoof is. I guess I haven't been paying attention. ?
Sort of? Part of it got chopped up into something awful by my editor, not sure if it's still on amazon; but in general, when I look back at it, I figure it was way too ambitious of a project. Not bad though. You live, you learn. Do I have your gmail?
Zontar, long time no talk to, man. How the fuck are ya?
Just moved to the American south again. It's interesting, how many varieties of thanksgiving birds are available here. Everything from cornish game hens, to duck, to goose, I've even seen pheasant.
It doesn't stick the ribs like turkey does, but the last couple generations of fake meat have tasted pretty good.
Yeah, go figure.
Some of us get our power from giant french perpetual motion machines that we built from specs on the internet in our back yards. Not like I would expect you to understand. It seems I am clearly without an intellectual equal on this site.
Dude, if this means no more streams of gold invites when I don't want them I'll just be crushed. What will I di with myself if half my facebook experience doesn't involve disabling requests from apps my friends use?
On a side note: people still use Facebook?
Yes, but perversely compelling.
I cannot find "have sex" among the choices.
I know, that's a shame. It would have been the most popular answer.
I think it's one of the best ideas to hit the web in the last ~5 years. Win for small businesses. Win for cheap-ass consumers. Well implemented. What's your beef?