Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Language in bill (Score 1) 780

by Jabbrwokk (#27834417) Attached to: Bill Would Declare Your Blog a Weapon
As well, it appears to refer to "real-world" bullying is the real problem:

using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior

To me, it sounds like the bill is defining cyberbullying as something that happens in addition to "real-world" bullying. I think it would be pretty rare for bullying to occur only online, and I'm not counting anonymous forum drama.

Comment: Maybe 3,000 isn't so bad (Score 1) 126

by Jabbrwokk (#27697143) Attached to: Paid Online News Venture Fails To Get Subscribers
You're right. However, they managed to get 3,000 subscribers, which means at $5 per month each they can now afford to pay a full-time newsroom staff of five people, on top of whatever the advertising pays for. Not too shabby.

The Pegasus News manages to cover the entire Dallas-Fort Worth area with a total staff of 19 people.

Comment: Re:But The Tyee brings in money (Score 1) 126

by Jabbrwokk (#27696087) Attached to: Paid Online News Venture Fails To Get Subscribers

The Tyee is not a news site. It is not "good journalism." It is an opinion site. They write stories with very clear opinionated slants. And people who agree with that slant gravitate to the site and call it "good journalism."

Their election "coverage" is nothing more than them asking for money to cover the election from the slant their readers want. Read their appeal again.

From your link:

We asked you to tell us which issues mattered most to you, promised to put your donation towards that area of reporting

This is no different than a consortium of advertisers requesting a newspaper cover an election issue from a particular point of view. This is the same old thing, just more obvious.

This shows me people don't want news that tries to be objective as possible, they want to read something that agrees with their opinions.

Comment: Standing ovation -- bah (Score 4, Insightful) 437

by Jabbrwokk (#27505403) Attached to: Star Trek Premiere Gets Standing Ovation, Surprise Showing In Austin

First screening impressions sometimes don't mean anything.

I would like to piggy-back on your comment suggesting early reviews were coloured by the excitement (which is probably bang-on) and point out that in the theatre where I watched the first screening of Star Wars: Episode I, there was a standing ovation after the movie was over.

Later I realized there was a standing ovation BECAUSE the movie was over.

It's not easy, being green. -- Kermit the Frog

Working...