Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:It's the money, stupid (Score 1) 279

by Kjella (#40192991) Attached to: Rights Holders See Little Point Creating Legal Content Sources

The way you pose your question is sounds like "Why does software developers like Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg get to make billions of dollars and be set for life? It's unfair, I as a plumber can't do that so it's only fair that I pirate everything I come across, particularly everything that says Microsoft on it." Star actors hit the lottery jackpot, that's why. Even in big Hollywood productions most the people are not getting paid millions. For example the LotR production employed 2400 people, of course two of them was Elijah Wood and Peter Jackson but most of them wasn't even on camera and most of the rest nameless extras on completely ordinary salaries, just like there's thousands of Microsoft developers working for ordinary pay. Pretending all actors are as rich as Elijah Wood is as stupid as pretending all software developers are as rich as Zuckerberg.

Comment: VMware ESXi, 3-4 Linuxes, 2+ Windows, IOS (Score 1) 152

by billstewart (#40190431) Attached to: I typically interact with X-many OSes per day:

A bunch of the machines I use are really virtual machines on top of VMware ESXi (though some are on VMware Workstation on Win7 or Linux.) But I do actually interact with the VMware, not just the guest OSs.

Android is fairly Linuxy inside, but the Linux bits are all well hidden, so I'm really dealing with Android and HTC. Does it count?

And I do mean IOS, not iOS. I think all the CatOS is gone.

Sourcefire IDS has a Linux base that their apps run on top of, but unfortunately it's not running either Debian or Redhat flavors, so I can't easily install extra tools. However, when it's having trouble connecting to things, it's still convenient to run a shell (over ssh or serial console) and check ifconfig.

And then there's a lot of Ubuntu, some Red Hat, Win7, WinXP, probably some Win2008.

Comment: Re:im certain (Score 1) 177

Yes... because your $500? ($1500??)+ PC is a simpler more reasonable solution than a $50 bluray player and $5 worth of cables (which you'd need for your computer too)... give me a break.

You do realize most of us would still have the PC for gaming and surfing and coding and whatever else we do right? So the only extra cost I had was the HDMI cable. It's one device less so less cable clutter, it's less shelf waste - I have a collection of discs and they're all collcting dust. And I can put it on my laptop or iphone or ipad, I can easily have a backup, browsing a folder is easier than searching through discs. I'm not going to make a mountain out of a mole hill but in an ideal world I'd still pick having my movie collection on a PC.

Image

Fox News Ties 'Flame' Malware To Angry Birds 158

Posted by Soulskill
from the there's-bad-men-in-our-internets dept.
eldavojohn writes "The title of this hard-hitting piece of journalism reads 'Powerful 'Flame' cyberweapon tied to popular Angry Birds game,' and opens with, 'The most sophisticated and powerful cyberweapon uncovered to date was written in the LUA computer language, cyber security experts tell Fox News — the same one used to make the incredibly popular Angry Birds game.' The rest of the details that are actually pertinent to the story follow that important message. The graphic for this story? Perhaps a map of Iran, or the LUA logo, or maybe the stereotyped evil hacker in a ski mask? Nope, all Angry Birds. Describing LUA as 'Gamer Code,' Fox for some reason (popularity?) selects Angry Birds from an insanely long list in their article implying guilt-by-shared-development-language. I'm not sure if explaining machine language to them would alleviate the perceived problem or cause them to burn their desktops in the streets and launch a new crusade to protect the children."

Comment: Re:Really? (Score 1) 1006

People left England because of religious oppression.... Then you know what they did?

It wasn't exactly atheist movements being persecuted, various minority/fringe religious groups were persecuted and fled to a country where they could make their own little wacky religious community. They weren't trying to get away from religion, just the dominant one in the country they left. Not sure why you'd think otherwise, the Bible Belt is far more religious than any area I know of in Europe. Oh maybe not in the Christianity statistics, but in the number of people that truly are deeply religious. Here in Norway almost 80% are technically in the state church and get counted as Christian, but only about 2% visit church weekly and 12% for Christmas. To most people church is a place for ceremonies like baptism, confirmation, marriage, funeral and the occasional memorial service with a dash of religion.

Comment: Re:Percentage of error greatly understated. (Score 1) 1006

True, but those systematic flaws to would be there every year. So unless there's some reason to believe people would lie more today than they did before then that the poll hasn't changed since 1982 probably means people's real opinions haven't changed either. That is to say, 30 years of science and evidence detailing the evolutionary process means absolutely nothing to them. Extrapolation is of course always dubious but I suspect that holds true both forwards and backwards in time, that is nothing we've done have changed their minds and nothing will.

Education

In America, 46% of People Hold a Creationist View of Human Origins 1006

Posted by Soulskill
from the you-ess-ay!-you-ess-ay! dept.
An anonymous reader writes "The latest Gallup poll is out, and it finds that 46% of Americans hold the view that God created humans in their present form within the last 10,000 years. According to Gallup, the percentage who hold this view has remained unchanged since 1982, when they first started asking the question. Roughly 33% of Americans believe in divinely guided evolution, and 15% believe that humans evolved without any supernatural help."
Books

War and Nookd — eBook Regex Gone Haywire 163

Posted by Soulskill
from the thinking-things-through dept.
PerlJedi tips a story that highlights one of the downsides to ebooks. A blogger who recently read Tolstoy's War and Peace on his Nook stumbled upon some odd phases, such as: "It was as if a light had been Nookd in a carved and painted lantern..." After seeing the word 'Nookd' a few more times, he found a dead-tree version of the book and discovered that the word was supposed to be 'kindled.' Every instance of the word 'kindle' in the ebook had been replaced with 'Nook.' "The Superior Formatting Publishing version isn’t a Barnes and Noble book, so this isn’t the work of a rogue Nook marketer from B&N. Rather, it’s likely that Superior Formatting Publishing ported its Kindle version of War and Peace over to the Nook — doing a search and replace to make sure that any Kindle references they’d inserted, such as in the advertising at the end of the book about their fine Kindle products, were simply changed to Nook. The unwitting hilarity of a publisher doing a 'find and replace' and accidentally changing the text of a canonical work of Western thought is alarming. Many versions of e-books are from similar outfits, that distribute public domain works formatted for Kindle or Nook at the lowest possible prices. The great democratizing factor of the ebook formats – that anyone can easily distribute – can also mean that readers can never be quite sure that they are viewing the texts as the author intended."

Nothing in progression can rest on its original plan. We may as well think of rocking a grown man in the cradle of an infant. -- Edmund Burke

Working...