Yet where would you build such a plant. The CA coast is filled with NIMBYS who wouldn't allow it.
And yet IRS has been used for political gain and private citizens tax information have been turned over political operatives. This was illegal under federal law, but still happened with no consequences.
What makes you think that this will not happen with private citizens medical info?
The problem is the progressives who brought us the attitude that a fetus is not a person are now contemplating that a baby is not a person until its a few years old.
You do know that neither Romney nor Nixon were conservatives right?
And you didn't say anything about the 3 blacks on the grand jury...why?
These lawyers wont go into defending average vermin...that is beneath a Harvard grad. These vermin (as that is what lawyers are) will end up either on Wall Street or a radical SJWs...
We already did (US ground troops in Liberia)...and Republicans had nothing to do with it.
You might want to look at all the bills that Reid has stopped in the Senate first. And the reason why the filibuster is being threatened so much is thats the only tool the Reps have. Reid has prevented the Reps from submitting any changes/addendums to bills. In other words, you have bought the Dem party line...hook, line and sinker.
I have to fly to Hawaii on business (yea, I know it sucks)....5.5 hours of ocean gets boring fast.
Of course, figuring that the head of CBS News is the brother to one of the Obama admins National Security Advisors also plays into things.
It's a prison where horrible things had to happen to prevent ever more horrible things from happening.
Had we signed on and actually meet the goals in Kyoto, individual CO2 emissions would have to be at the level they were in 1850.
A few points of order though.
- Clinton signed Kyoto but never sent it to the senate. The reason being is it never had support from either party and would have died by about 90 votes.
- Second, W could have withdrawn from Kyoto with a stroke of a pen as the President can cancel treaties.
- And finally, treaties inherently do not have the force of law behind them. They do not supersede Federal, State or even individual rights (see the recent Bond v US ruling). Now the Obama admin doesn't agree with this as they argued that a treaty trumps everything....but as we know with Obama/Holder, just because he says its doesn't mean its true.
Wasn't that called MySpace???
This is like Republicans being anti-ethanol in general unless they are from Iowa....